Jaguar F-Pace
Car comparison
Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6vsLand Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019 2.0 P290
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019
2.0 P290
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lightest1,954 kg4,308 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,031 km641 mi
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 290hp216kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,954kg4,308lb | 1,961kg4,323lb |
| Gross weight | 2,570kg5,666lb | - |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.5s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 86.5s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.7s Calculated | 31.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t114kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 358Nm/t240lb-ft/ton Calculated | 204Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,031km641mi Calculated | 882km548mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,731mm186in | 4,597mm181in |
| Width | 2,071mm82in | - |
| Height | 1,666mm66in | 1,727mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,741mm108in |
| Front track | 1,641mm65in | 1,636mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,654mm65in | 1,643mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 215mm8in | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | - | 157L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,651L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | 170g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.7 s | 31.1 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 290 hp 216 kW |
Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6 has 10 hp more than Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290 and Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | 1,954 kg 4,308 lb |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 1,961 kg 4,323 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | 6.4 s |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6 and Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6 and Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | 154 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | 1,031 km 641 mi |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 882 km 548 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.4 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 290 hp 216 kW | 7.0 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | 154 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-Pace30d V6 | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 290 hp 216 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,954 kg 4,308 lb | 1,961 kg 4,323 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,031 km 641 mi | 882 km 548 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 170 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 157 L 5.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6 | Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 300 Nm more
- Is 7 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 150 km (93 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























