Land Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Land Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019 2.0 P290vsMercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLS (X167)
GLS 350d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful290 hp216 kW
- Lightest1,961 kg4,323 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Best economy score86/100
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,111 km690 mi
- Largest trunk355 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 290hp216kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,961kg4,323lb | 2,425kg5,346lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,250kg7,165lb |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.5s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 96.2s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.1s Calculated | 36.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 204Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated | 247Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 882km548mi Calculated | 1,111km690mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 2,925cc178cu in |
| Length | 4,597mm181in | 5,207mm205in |
| Width | - | 1,956mm77in |
| Height | 1,727mm68in | 1,838mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 2,741mm108in | 3,135mm123in |
| Front track | 1,636mm64in | 1,669mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,643mm65in | 1,692mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in | 215mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 157L | 355L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,651L | 2,400L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 3,400-4,600 rpm | 1,200-3,200 rpm | 4,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.1 s | 36.2 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 290 hp 216 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 286 hp 213 kW |
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290 has 4 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d and Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 1,961 kg 4,323 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 2,425 kg 5,346 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 7.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 7.0 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 882 km 548 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 1,111 km 690 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 290 hp 216 kW | 7.0 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 286 hp 213 kW | 7.0 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 290 hp 216 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,961 kg 4,323 lb | 2,425 kg 5,346 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 882 km 548 mi | 1,111 km 690 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 157 L 5.5 cu ft | 355 L 12.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290 | Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.30 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,995 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 464 kg lighter
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d
- Has 200 Nm more
- Has 230 km (143 mi) more estimated range
- Has 198 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























