Car comparison

Land Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019 2.0 D240vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Land Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019

2.0 D240

240 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-present
VS

Volvo XC90 II

2.0 T5

250 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,934 kg
    4,264 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    124 hp/t
    93 kW/t
    8.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,016 km
    631 mi
  • Largest trunk
    1,179 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLand RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Power
240hp179kW
250hp186kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,934kg4,264lb
2,151kg4,742lb
Gross weight
2,620kg5,776lb
-
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
98.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
93.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
43.8s
Calculated
47.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton
Calculated
163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,016km631mi
Calculated
877km545mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,597mm181in
4,950mm195in
Width
2,069mm81in
1,923mm76in
Height
1,727mm68in
1,776mm70in
Wheelbase
2,741mm108in
2,984mm117in
Front track
1,636mm64in
1,673mm66in
Rear track
1,643mm65in
1,675mm66in
Ground clearance
212mm8in
238mm9in
Trunk volume
1,179L
314L
Max trunk volume
1,794L
1,886L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
65L
71L
CO2 emissions-
189g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5PowerTorque
  • Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D2404,000 rpm1,500-3,000 rpm4,250 rpm
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLand RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
43.8 s
47.5 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240
240 hp
179 kW
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 has 10 hp more than Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240
1,934 kg
4,264 lb
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
2,151 kg
4,742 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240
220 km/h
137 mph
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D2407.9 s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T57.9 s

Although Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 has more power, Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240
1,016 km
631 mi
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
877 km
545 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240
240 hp
179 kW
7.9 s
220 km/h
137 mph
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
7.9 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,179 L
41.6 cu ft
Length
4,597 mm
181.0 in
Height
1,727 mm
68.0 in
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.9 s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLand RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Power
240 hp
179 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
7.9 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,934 kg
4,264 lb
2,151 kg
4,742 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,179 L
41.6 cu ft
Length
4,597 mm
181.0 in
Height
1,727 mm
68.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Range score
1,016 km
631 mi
877 km
545 mi
CO2 score
-
189 g/km
Trunk score
1,179 L
41.6 cu ft
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLand Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km14.17 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi22.81 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year2,126 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240

  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Is 217 kg lighter
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 139 km (86 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 865 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5

  • Has 10 hp more

Pros

  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 D240
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 D240
2.0 D240
VS
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
2.0 T5
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
2.0 D240
25d
VS
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240vsJaguarF-Pace25d
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
2.0 D240
2.0 D5
VS
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
2.0 D240
300
VS
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240vsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
2.0 D240
2.0
VS
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
2.0 T5
2.0i
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 D240
2.0 BiTDI
VS
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
2.0 T5
550T
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsChevroletEquinox III550T
2.0 D240
45 TDI
VS
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI
Land Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019 2.0 D240 vs Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster