Volvo XC90 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5vsLand Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019 2.0 D240
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019
2.0 D240
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,934 kg4,264 lb
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t93 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk1,179 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,145 km712 mi
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 235hp175kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,205kg4,861lb | 1,934kg4,264lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,620kg5,776lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 98.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 98.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 43.6s Calculated | 43.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 107hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,145km712mi Calculated | 1,016km631mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,950mm195in | 4,597mm181in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 2,069mm81in |
| Height | 1,776mm70in | 1,727mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,984mm117in | 2,741mm108in |
| Front track | 1,673mm66in | 1,636mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,675mm66in | 1,643mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 238mm9in | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 314L | 1,179L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,886L | 1,794L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | 162g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,220 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 43.6 s | 43.8 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240 has 5 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 and Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 2,205 kg 4,861 lb |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 1,934 kg 4,264 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 7.8 s |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 7.9 s |
Although Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240 has more power, Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 and Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 107 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 1,145 km 712 mi |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 1,016 km 631 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.8 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.9 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | 107 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC90 II2.0 D5 | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D240 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 235 hp 175 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,205 kg 4,861 lb | 1,934 kg 4,264 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,145 km 712 mi | 1,016 km 631 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 162 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 314 L 11.1 cu ft | 1,179 L 41.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 107 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5 | Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 D5
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 130 km (80 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D240
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 271 kg lighter
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 865 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























