Koenigsegg Gemera
Car comparison
Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0vsTesla Model S · Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTesla Model S · Facelift 2016
Performance 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h1.9 s
- Fastest top speed400 km/h249 mph
- Lightest1,850 kg4,079 lb
- Best power-to-weight324 hp/t242 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
- Best performance score91/100
- Best economy score0/100
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh
- Most powerful611 hp456 kW
- Highest torque967 Nm713 lb-ft
- Largest trunk745 L
- Best overall score88/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | KoenigseggGemera2.0 | TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 600hp447kW | 611hp456kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 967Nm713lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 2,253kg4,967lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,720kg5,997lb |
| Top speed | 400 km/h 249 mph | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 36.4s99% target: 396 km/h / 246 mph Calculated | 34.9s99% target: 258 km/h / 161 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 1.9s | 2.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 4.8s Calculated | 9.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 1.8s Calculated | 2.4s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 8.5s Calculated | 10.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 324hp/t242kW/t147hp/1000 lb Calculated | 271hp/t202kW/t123hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 324Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated | 429Nm/t287lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,975mm196in | 4,970mm196in |
| Width | 1,988mm78in | 1,964mm77in |
| Height | 1,295mm51in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,000mm118in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | - | 1,662mm65in |
| Rear track | - | 1,700mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 117mm5in | 160mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 200L | 745L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,645L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KoenigseggGemera2.0 | TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 1.8 s | 2.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 1.9 s | 2.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 4.8 s | 9.1 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 12.1 s | - |
| Top speed | 400 km/h 249 mph | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.5 s | 1.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 3.8 s | 4.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 5.6 s | 6.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 7.2 s | 8.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 8.5 s | 10.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 277 km/h 172 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggGemera2.0 | 600 hp 447 kW |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 611 hp 456 kW |
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh has 11 hp more than Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0 and Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggGemera2.0 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 967 Nm 713 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggGemera2.0 | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 2,253 kg 4,967 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggGemera2.0 | 400 km/h 249 mph |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 261 km/h 162 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggGemera2.0 | 1.9 s |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 2.5 s |
Although Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh has more power, Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0 and Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggGemera2.0 | 324 hp/t 242 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 271 hp/t 202 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggGemera2.0 | 600 hp 447 kW | 1.9 s | 400 km/h 249 mph |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 611 hp 456 kW | 2.5 s | 261 km/h 162 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggGemera2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KoenigseggGemera2.0 | TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 600 hp 447 kW | 611 hp 456 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 967 Nm 713 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 1.9 s | 2.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 400 km/h 249 mph | 261 km/h 162 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb | 2,253 kg 4,967 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 200 L 7.1 cu ft | 745 L 26.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 324 hp/t 242 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 271 hp/t 202 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0
- Is 403 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 139 km/h (86 mph) higher top speed
- Has 53 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 367 Nm more
- Has 545 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























