Car comparison

Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0vsBMW M8 Coupe (F92) 4.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Koenigsegg Gemera

2.0

600 hpHybridAWDAutomaticTwin-turbo2020-present
VS

BMW M8 Coupe (F92)

4.4 V8

600 hp4395 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2019-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    1.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    400 km/h
    249 mph
  • Most powerful
    600 hp
    447 kW
  • Lightest
    1,850 kg
    4,079 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    324 hp/t
    242 kW/t
    3.1 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    77/100
  • Best performance score
    91/100

BMW M8 Coupe (F92) 4.4 V8

  • Highest torque
    750 Nm
    553 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    420 L
  • Best economy score
    78/100
  • Best practicality score
    52/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelKoenigseggGemera2.0BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
Power
600hp447kW
600hp447kW
Torque
600Nm443lb-ft
750Nm553lb-ft
Curb weight
1,850kg4,079lb
1,885kg4,156lb
Gross weight-
2,385kg5,258lb
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
36.4s99% target: 396 km/h / 246 mph
Calculated
39.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
1.9s
3.3s
0-200 km/h
4.8s
Calculated
10.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
1.8s
Calculated
3.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
15.2L/100 km15.5mpg US18.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
8.5s
Calculated
11.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
324hp/t242kW/t147hp/1000 lb
Calculated
318hp/t237kW/t144hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
324Nm/t217lb-ft/ton
Calculated
398Nm/t266lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Displacement-
4,395cc268cu in
Length
4,975mm196in
4,867mm192in
Width
1,988mm78in
1,907mm75in
Height
1,295mm51in
1,362mm54in
Wheelbase
3,000mm118in
2,827mm111in
Front track-
1,627mm64in
Rear track-
1,632mm64in
Ground clearance
117mm5in
-
Trunk volume
200L
-
Max trunk volume-
420L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
75L
-
CO2 emissions-
242g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0BMW M8 Coupe (F92) 4.4 V8PowerTorque
  • Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0: Power / Torque
  • BMW M8 Coupe (F92) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
KoenigseggGemera2.07,500 rpm2,000-7,000 rpm8,500 rpm
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V86,000 rpm1,800-5,600 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricKoenigseggGemera2.0BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
1.8 s
3.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
1.9 s
3.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
4.8 s
10.8 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
12.1 s
-
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.5 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
3.8 s
4.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
5.6 s
7.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
7.2 s
9.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
8.5 s
11.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
277 km/h
172 mph
203 km/h
126 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggGemera2.0
600 hp
447 kW
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
600 hp
447 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggGemera2.0
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
750 Nm
553 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggGemera2.0
1,850 kg
4,079 lb
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
1,885 kg
4,156 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggGemera2.0
400 km/h
249 mph
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggGemera2.01.9 s
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V83.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0 and BMW M8 Coupe (F92) 4.4 V8: 1.4 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggGemera2.0
324 hp/t
242 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
318 hp/t
237 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
KoenigseggGemera2.0
600 hp
447 kW
1.9 s
400 km/h
249 mph
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
600 hp
447 kW
3.3 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
KoenigseggGemera2.0
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h1.9 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
200 L
7.1 cu ft
Length
4,975 mm
195.9 in
Height
1,295 mm
51.0 in
BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h3.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,867 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,362 mm
53.6 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleKoenigseggGemera2.0BMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
Power
600 hp
447 kW
600 hp
447 kW
Torque
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
Acceleration
1.9 s
3.3 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,850 kg
4,079 lb
1,885 kg
4,156 lb
Fuel consumption
-
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
200 L
7.1 cu ft
Length
4,975 mm
195.9 in
Height
1,295 mm
51.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,867 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,362 mm
53.6 in
CO2 score
-
242 g/km
Trunk score
200 L
7.1 cu ft
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
324 hp/t
242 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
318 hp/t
237 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW M8 Coupe (F92) 4.4 V8
Consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km18.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi29.85 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,783 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0

  • Is 35 kg lighter
  • Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 135 km/h (84 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

BMW M8 Coupe (F92) 4.4 V8

  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Has 220 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0
BMW M8 Coupe (F92) 4.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0 vs BMW M8 Coupe (F92) 4.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster