Car comparison

Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 3.8 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Koenigsegg Gemera

2.0

600 hpHybridAWDAutomaticTwin-turbo2020-present
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016

3.8 V6

570 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2016-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6

  • Highest torque
    637 Nm
    470 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,752 kg
    3,862 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    325 hp/t
    243 kW/t
    3.1 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    315 L
  • Best overall score
    78/100
  • Best performance score
    92/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100

Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    1.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    400 km/h
    249 mph
  • Most powerful
    600 hp
    447 kW
  • Best practicality score
    48/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelKoenigseggGemera2.0NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
Power
600hp447kW
570hp425kW
Torque
600Nm443lb-ft
637Nm470lb-ft
Curb weight
1,850kg4,079lb
1,752kg3,862lb
Gross weight-
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
To 99% top speed
36.4s99% target: 396 km/h / 246 mph
Calculated
39.8s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
1.9s
2.8s
0-200 km/h
4.8s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
1.8s
Calculated
2.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
8.5s
Calculated
10.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
324hp/t242kW/t147hp/1000 lb
Calculated
325hp/t243kW/t148hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
324Nm/t217lb-ft/ton
Calculated
364Nm/t243lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
627km390mi
Calculated
Displacement-
3,799cc232cu in
Length
4,975mm196in
4,710mm185in
Width
1,988mm78in
1,895mm75in
Height
1,295mm51in
1,370mm54in
Wheelbase
3,000mm118in
2,780mm109in
Front track-
1,590mm63in
Rear track-
1,600mm63in
Ground clearance
117mm5in
105mm4in
Trunk volume
200L
315L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
75L
74L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6PowerTorque
  • Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
KoenigseggGemera2.07,500 rpm2,000-7,000 rpm8,500 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V66,800 rpm3,300-5,800 rpm7,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricKoenigseggGemera2.0NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
1.8 s
2.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
1.9 s
2.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
4.8 s
7.9 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
12.1 s
-
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.5 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
3.8 s
4.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
5.6 s
6.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
7.2 s
8.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
8.5 s
10.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
277 km/h
172 mph
228 km/h
142 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggGemera2.0
600 hp
447 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
570 hp
425 kW

Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0 has 30 hp more than Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6 and Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0: 30 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggGemera2.0
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
637 Nm
470 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggGemera2.0
1,850 kg
4,079 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
1,752 kg
3,862 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggGemera2.0
400 km/h
249 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
315 km/h
196 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggGemera2.01.9 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V62.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6: 0.9 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggGemera2.0
324 hp/t
242 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
325 hp/t
243 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
KoenigseggGemera2.0
600 hp
447 kW
1.9 s
400 km/h
249 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
570 hp
425 kW
2.8 s
315 km/h
196 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
KoenigseggGemera2.0
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h1.9 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
200 L
7.1 cu ft
Length
4,975 mm
195.9 in
Height
1,295 mm
51.0 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
Power
570 hp
425 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,710 mm
185.4 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleKoenigseggGemera2.0NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
570 hp
425 kW
Torque
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
637 Nm
470 lb-ft
Acceleration
1.9 s
2.8 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Lightness
1,850 kg
4,079 lb
1,752 kg
3,862 lb
Fuel consumption
-
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
200 L
7.1 cu ft
Length
4,975 mm
195.9 in
Height
1,295 mm
51.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,710 mm
185.4 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Range score
-
627 km
390 mi
Trunk score
200 L
7.1 cu ft
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
324 hp/t
242 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
325 hp/t
243 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6
Consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi33.23 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,098 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0

  • Has 30 hp more
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 85 km/h (53 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6

  • Has 37 Nm more
  • Is 98 kg lighter
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 115 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
Nismo 3.8 V6
VS
KoenigseggGemera2.0vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
2.0
4.4 V8
VS
KoenigseggGemera2.0vsBMWM8 Coupe (F92)4.4 V8
3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
2.0
6.0 V12
VS
KoenigseggGemera2.0vsAston MartinRapide AMR6.0 V12
3.8 V6
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
2.0
3.8 V8
VS
KoenigseggGemera2.0vsMcLaren600LT Spider3.8 V8
3.8 V6
5.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
2.0
AMG SL 63 V8
VS
KoenigseggGemera2.0vsMercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 63 V8
3.8 V6
C 4.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8
3.8 V6
Turbo 3.8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6vsPorsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
2.0
4.4 V8
VS
KoenigseggGemera2.0vsBMWM8 Gran Coupe (F93)4.4 V8
Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 3.8 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster