Porsche 911 (992)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 3.8 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016
3.8 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.8 s
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph Unrestricted320 km/h199 mph Restricted
- Most powerful580 hp433 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Lightest1,640 kg3,616 lb
- Best power-to-weight354 hp/t264 kW/t2.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.3 L/100 km15.4 mpg US18.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Best overall score79/100
- Best performance score94/100
- Best economy score77/100
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6
- Best estimated range627 km390 mi
- Largest trunk315 L
- Best practicality score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8 | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 580hp433kW | 570hp425kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 637Nm470lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,640kg3,616lb | 1,752kg3,862lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Calculated | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.8s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 39.8s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.8s | 2.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.7s | 7.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.7s Calculated | 2.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.7s Calculated | 10.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 354hp/t264kW/t160hp/1000 lb Calculated | 325hp/t243kW/t148hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 457Nm/t306lb-ft/ton Calculated | 364Nm/t243lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 604km375mi Calculated | 627km390mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,745cc229cu in | 3,799cc232cu in |
| Length | 4,535mm179in | 4,710mm185in |
| Width | 1,900mm75in | 1,895mm75in |
| Height | 1,303mm51in | 1,370mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,780mm109in |
| Front track | 1,583mm62in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,600mm63in | 1,600mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 105mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 264L | 315L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 74L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8: Power / Torque
- Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8 | 6,500 rpm | 2,250-4,500 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 6,800 rpm | 3,300-5,800 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8 | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.7 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 59.2 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Likely limited | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.6 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.5 s | 4.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.9 s | 8.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.7 s | 10.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 209 km/h 130 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8 | 580 hp 433 kW |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 570 hp 425 kW |
Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8 has 10 hp more than Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6 and Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 637 Nm 470 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8 | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 1,752 kg 3,862 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8 | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8 | 2.8 s |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 2.8 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8 | 354 hp/t 264 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 325 hp/t 243 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8 | 604 km 375 mi |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 627 km 390 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8 | 580 hp 433 kW | 2.8 s | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 570 hp 425 kW | 2.8 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 2.8 s |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 2.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8 | 354 hp/t 264 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 325 hp/t 243 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8 | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 580 hp 433 kW | 570 hp 425 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 637 Nm 470 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.8 s | 2.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | 1,752 kg 3,862 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 604 km 375 mi | 627 km 390 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 264 L 9.3 cu ft | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 354 hp/t 264 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 325 hp/t 243 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8 | Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 113 Nm more
- Is 112 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6
- Has 24 km (15 mi) more estimated range
- Has 51 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























