Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 3.8 V6vsJaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2020 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2020
5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8
- Most powerful575 hp429 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lightest1,743 kg3,843 lb
- Best power-to-weight330 hp/t246 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range636 km395 mi
- Best economy score77/100
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.8 s
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph
- Largest trunk315 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score92/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 570hp425kW | 575hp429kW |
| Torque | 637Nm470lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,752kg3,862lb | 1,743kg3,843lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | - |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 39.8s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 54.4s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.8s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.9s Calculated | 10.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.7s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 10.2s Calculated | 11.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 325hp/t243kW/t148hp/1000 lb Calculated | 330hp/t246kW/t150hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 364Nm/t243lb-ft/ton Calculated | 402Nm/t269lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 627km390mi Calculated | 636km395mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,799cc232cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,710mm185in | 4,470mm176in |
| Width | 1,895mm75in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,370mm54in | 1,311mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,780mm109in | 2,622mm103in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,600mm63in | 1,610mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 105mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 315L | 299L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 509L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 252g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 6,800 rpm | 3,300-5,800 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.7 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.8 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.9 s | 10.6 s |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.5 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.7 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.6 s | 9.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.2 s | 11.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 228 km/h 142 mph | 208 km/h 130 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 570 hp 425 kW |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 575 hp 429 kW |
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 has 5 hp more than Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 637 Nm 470 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 1,752 kg 3,862 lb |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 1,743 kg 3,843 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 2.8 s |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 3.7 s |
Although Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 has more power, Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 325 hp/t 243 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 330 hp/t 246 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 627 km 390 mi |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 636 km 395 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 570 hp 425 kW | 2.8 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 575 hp 429 kW | 3.7 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 2.8 s |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 325 hp/t 243 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 330 hp/t 246 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 570 hp 425 kW | 575 hp 429 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 637 Nm 470 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.8 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,752 kg 3,862 lb | 1,743 kg 3,843 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 627 km 390 mi | 636 km 395 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 252 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | 299 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 325 hp/t 243 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 330 hp/t 246 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6 | Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 63 Nm more
- Is 9 kg lighter
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 9 km (6 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























