Car comparison

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 3.8 V6vsAston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016

3.8 V6

570 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2016-2023
VS

Aston Martin V8 Vantage

4.0 V8

510 hp3982 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2017-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8

  • Highest torque
    685 Nm
    505 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,530 kg
    3,373 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    333 hp/t
    249 kW/t
    3.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.5 L/100 km
    22.4 mpg US
    26.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.4 L/100 km
    16.3 mpg US
    19.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.2 L/100 km
    28.7 mpg US
    34.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    695 km
    432 mi
  • Best economy score
    79/100

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    315 km/h
    196 mph
  • Most powerful
    570 hp
    425 kW
  • Best overall score
    78/100
  • Best performance score
    92/100
  • Best practicality score
    48/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8
Power
570hp425kW
510hp380kW
Torque
637Nm470lb-ft
685Nm505lb-ft
Curb weight
1,752kg3,862lb
1,530kg3,373lb
Gross weight
2,200kg4,850lb
-
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
314 km/h
195 mph
To 99% top speed
39.8s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
50.9s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.8s
3.6s
0-200 km/h
7.9s
Calculated
10.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
2.7s
Calculated
3.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
10.2s
Calculated
11.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
325hp/t243kW/t148hp/1000 lb
Calculated
333hp/t249kW/t151hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
364Nm/t243lb-ft/ton
Calculated
448Nm/t300lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
627km390mi
Calculated
695km432mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,799cc232cu in
3,982cc243cu in
Length
4,710mm185in
4,465mm176in
Width
1,895mm75in
1,942mm76in
Height
1,370mm54in
1,273mm50in
Wheelbase
2,780mm109in
2,704mm106in
Front track
1,590mm63in
-
Rear track
1,600mm63in
-
Ground clearance
105mm4in
-
Trunk volume
315L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
2
Fuel tank
74L
73L
CO2 emissions-
245g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
  • Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V66,800 rpm3,300-5,800 rpm7,050 rpm
Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V86,000 rpm2,000-5,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.7 s
3.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.8 s
3.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
7.9 s
10.1 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
314 km/h
195 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.8 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
4.5 s
5.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
6.7 s
7.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
8.6 s
9.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.2 s
11.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
228 km/h
142 mph
211 km/h
131 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
570 hp
425 kW
Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6 has 60 hp more than Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6: 60 hp (45 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
637 Nm
470 lb-ft
Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8
685 Nm
505 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
1,752 kg
3,862 lb
Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8
1,530 kg
3,373 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
315 km/h
196 mph
Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8
314 km/h
195 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V62.8 s
Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V83.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6 and Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
325 hp/t
243 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8
333 hp/t
249 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
627 km
390 mi
Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8
695 km
432 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
570 hp
425 kW
2.8 s
315 km/h
196 mph
Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW
3.6 s
314 km/h
195 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
Power
570 hp
425 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,710 mm
185.4 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h3.6 s
Top speed
314 km/h
195 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,465 mm
175.8 in
Height
1,273 mm
50.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
Power
570 hp
425 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h3.6 s
Top speed
314 km/h
195 mph
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
2.8 s
Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
3.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6
325 hp/t
243 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8
333 hp/t
249 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8
Power
570 hp
425 kW
510 hp
380 kW
Torque
637 Nm
470 lb-ft
685 Nm
505 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.8 s
3.6 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
314 km/h
195 mph
Lightness
1,752 kg
3,862 lb
1,530 kg
3,373 lb
Fuel consumption
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,710 mm
185.4 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,465 mm
175.8 in
Height
1,273 mm
50.1 in
Range score
627 km
390 mi
695 km
432 mi
CO2 score
-
245 g/km
Trunk score
315 L
11.1 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
325 hp/t
243 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
333 hp/t
249 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8
Consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.65 LC100 km18.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi33.23 LC100 mi29.57 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,098 LC/year2,756 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6

  • Has 60 hp more
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8

  • Has 48 Nm more
  • Is 222 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 68 km (42 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6
Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
4.0 V8
S 4.7 V8
VS
Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8vsAston MartinV8 VantageFacelift 2008S 4.7 V8
3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8vsAston MartinV8 VantageFacelift 20244.0 V8
3.8 V6
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8vsAston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8
3.8 V6
5.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
4.0 V8
5.3 i V8 32V
VS
Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8vsAston MartinV8 Vantage (II)5.3 i V8 32V
3.8 V6
C 4.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017C 4.0 V8
4.0 V8
N430 4.7 V8
VS
Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8vsAston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 2008N430 4.7 V8
3.8 V6
Turbo 3.8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6vsPorsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8vsAston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 20244.0 V8
Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 3.8 V6 vs Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster