Koenigsegg Gemera
Car comparison
Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0vsBMW M8 Gran Coupe (F93) 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M8 Gran Coupe (F93)
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h1.9 s
- Fastest top speed400 km/h249 mph
- Most powerful600 hp447 kW
- Lightest1,850 kg4,079 lb
- Best power-to-weight324 hp/t242 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
- Best performance score91/100
BMW M8 Gran Coupe (F93) 4.4 V8
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best overall score81/100
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score65/100
Specification comparison
| Model | KoenigseggGemera2.0 | BMWM8 Gran Coupe (F93)4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 600hp447kW | 600hp447kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 1,980kg4,365lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,440kg5,379lb |
| Top speed | 400 km/h 249 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 36.4s99% target: 396 km/h / 246 mph Calculated | 42.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 1.9s | 3.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 4.8s Calculated | 11.2s |
| 0-60 mph | 1.8s Calculated | 3.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 15.2L/100 km15.5mpg US18.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 8.5s Calculated | 11.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 324hp/t242kW/t147hp/1000 lb Calculated | 303hp/t226kW/t137hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 324Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated | 379Nm/t253lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 636km395mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,975mm196in | 5,098mm201in |
| Width | 1,988mm78in | 1,943mm76in |
| Height | 1,295mm51in | 1,420mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 3,000mm118in | 3,027mm119in |
| Front track | - | 1,626mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,660mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 117mm5in | 130mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 200L | 440L |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 244g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0: Power / Torque
- BMW M8 Gran Coupe (F93) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggGemera2.0 | 7,500 rpm | 2,000-7,000 rpm | 8,500 rpm |
| BMWM8 Gran Coupe (F93)4.4 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KoenigseggGemera2.0 | BMWM8 Gran Coupe (F93)4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 1.8 s | 3.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 1.9 s | 3.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 4.8 s | 11.2 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 12.1 s | - |
| Top speed | 400 km/h 249 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.5 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 3.8 s | 4.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 5.6 s | 7.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 7.2 s | 9.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 8.5 s | 11.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 277 km/h 172 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggGemera2.0 | 600 hp 447 kW |
| BMWM8 Gran Coupe (F93)4.4 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggGemera2.0 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| BMWM8 Gran Coupe (F93)4.4 V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggGemera2.0 | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb |
| BMWM8 Gran Coupe (F93)4.4 V8 | 1,980 kg 4,365 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggGemera2.0 | 400 km/h 249 mph |
| BMWM8 Gran Coupe (F93)4.4 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggGemera2.0 | 1.9 s |
| BMWM8 Gran Coupe (F93)4.4 V8 | 3.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0 and BMW M8 Gran Coupe (F93) 4.4 V8: 1.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggGemera2.0 | 324 hp/t 242 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| BMWM8 Gran Coupe (F93)4.4 V8 | 303 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggGemera2.0 | 600 hp 447 kW | 1.9 s | 400 km/h 249 mph |
| BMWM8 Gran Coupe (F93)4.4 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW | 3.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggGemera2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM8 Gran Coupe (F93)4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KoenigseggGemera2.0 | BMWM8 Gran Coupe (F93)4.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 600 hp 447 kW | 600 hp 447 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 1.9 s | 3.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 400 km/h 249 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb | 1,980 kg 4,365 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 636 km 395 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 244 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 200 L 7.1 cu ft | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 324 hp/t 242 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 303 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M8 Gran Coupe (F93) 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.72 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.13 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,809 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Koenigsegg Gemera 2.0
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 135 km/h (84 mph) higher top speed
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
BMW M8 Gran Coupe (F93) 4.4 V8
- Has 150 Nm more
- Has 240 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























