Tesla Model S · Facelift 2016
Performance 100 kWh
611 hpElectricAWDAutomaticLiftback / fastback2019-2021
Car comparison
Tesla Model S · Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWhvsAston Martin Rapide E 65 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Aston Martin Rapide E
65 kWh
612 hpElectricRWDAutomaticLiftback / fastback2019-2020
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.5 s
- Fastest top speed261 km/h162 mph
- Highest torque967 Nm713 lb-ft
- Best overall score88/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Aston Martin Rapide E 65 kWh
- Most powerful612 hp456 kW
- Lightest2,140 kg4,718 lb
- Best power-to-weight286 hp/t213 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 611hp456kW | 612hp456kW |
| Torque | 967Nm713lb-ft | 950Nm701lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,253kg4,967lb | 2,140kg4,718lb |
| Gross weight | 2,720kg5,997lb | - |
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 34.9s99% target: 258 km/h / 161 mph Calculated | 64.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.5s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.1s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.4s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 10.3s Calculated | 12.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 271hp/t202kW/t123hp/1000 lb Calculated | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 429Nm/t287lb-ft/ton Calculated | 444Nm/t297lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,970mm196in | 5,019mm198in |
| Width | 1,964mm77in | 1,929mm76in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,350mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,989mm118in |
| Front track | 1,662mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,700mm67in | - |
| Ground clearance | 160mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 745L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,645L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.4 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.5 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.1 s | 16.0 s |
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.6 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.3 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.6 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.6 s | 10.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.3 s | 12.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 210 km/h 130 mph | 181 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 611 hp 456 kW |
| Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | 612 hp 456 kW |
Aston Martin Rapide E 65 kWh has 1 hp more than Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh and Aston Martin Rapide E 65 kWh: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 967 Nm 713 lb-ft |
| Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | 950 Nm 701 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 2,253 kg 4,967 lb |
| Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | 2,140 kg 4,718 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 2.5 s |
| Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | 4.2 s |
Although Aston Martin Rapide E 65 kWh has more power, Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh and Aston Martin Rapide E 65 kWh: 1.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 271 hp/t 202 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 611 hp 456 kW | 2.5 s | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | 612 hp 456 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 611 hp 456 kW | 612 hp 456 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 967 Nm 713 lb-ft | 950 Nm 701 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.5 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,253 kg 4,967 lb | 2,140 kg 4,718 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 745 L 26.3 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 271 hp/t 202 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh
- Has 17 Nm more
- Is 1.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Aston Martin Rapide E 65 kWh
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 113 kg lighter
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Tesla Model S Performance 100 kWh
Aston Martin Rapide E 65 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWhvsTeslaModel SFacelift 2021Long Range 100 kWh
Aston MartinRapide E65 kWhvsAston MartinRapide AMR6.0 V12
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWhvsTeslaModel SP90D 90 kWh
Aston MartinRapide E65 kWhvsAston MartinRapide S6.0 V12
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWhvsAUDIRS7 Sportback (C8)4.0 TFSI V8
Aston MartinRapide E65 kWhvsAston MartinRapide6.0 V12
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWhvsLotusEmeya102 kWh
Aston MartinRapide E65 kWhvsTeslaModel SFacelift 2016P100D 100 kWh
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWhvsAUDIRS5 Sportback (F5)2.9 TFSI V6
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWhvsFordMustang VIFacelift 2017Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8