Tesla Model S · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Tesla Model S · Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWhvsMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) AMG EQS 53 120 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQS (V297)
AMG EQS 53 120 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.5 s
- Fastest top speed261 km/h162 mph
- Highest torque967 Nm713 lb-ft
- Lightest2,253 kg4,967 lb
- Best power-to-weight271 hp/t202 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk745 L
- Best overall score88/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) AMG EQS 53 120 kWh
- Most powerful658 hp491 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 611hp456kW | 658hp491kW |
| Torque | 967Nm713lb-ft | 950Nm701lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,253kg4,967lb | 2,605kg5,743lb |
| Gross weight | 2,720kg5,997lb | 3,225kg7,110lb |
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 34.9s99% target: 258 km/h / 161 mph Calculated | 47.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.5s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.1s Calculated | 17.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.4s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 10.3s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 271hp/t202kW/t123hp/1000 lb Calculated | 253hp/t188kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 429Nm/t287lb-ft/ton Calculated | 365Nm/t244lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,970mm196in | 5,223mm206in |
| Width | 1,964mm77in | 1,926mm76in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,518mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | 1,662mm65in | 1,660mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,700mm67in | 1,653mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 160mm6in | 139mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 745L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,645L | 1,770L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.4 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.5 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.1 s | 17.6 s |
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.6 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.3 s | 5.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.6 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.6 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.3 s | 12.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 210 km/h 130 mph | 178 km/h 111 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 611 hp 456 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh | 658 hp 491 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) AMG EQS 53 120 kWh has 47 hp more than Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) AMG EQS 53 120 kWh: 47 hp (35 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 967 Nm 713 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh | 950 Nm 701 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 2,253 kg 4,967 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh | 2,605 kg 5,743 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 2.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh | 3.8 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) AMG EQS 53 120 kWh has more power, Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) AMG EQS 53 120 kWh: 1.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 271 hp/t 202 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh | 253 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 611 hp 456 kW | 2.5 s | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh | 658 hp 491 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 611 hp 456 kW | 658 hp 491 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 967 Nm 713 lb-ft | 950 Nm 701 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.5 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,253 kg 4,967 lb | 2,605 kg 5,743 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 745 L 26.3 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 271 hp/t 202 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 253 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh
- Has 17 Nm more
- Is 352 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 31 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 135 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) AMG EQS 53 120 kWh
- Has 47 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























