Car comparison

Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32VvsJaguar XJS Coupe 6.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Maserati Shamal

3.2 i V8 32V

326 hp3217 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedCoupe1989-1995
VS

Jaguar XJS Coupe

6.0

318 hp5994 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe1991-1994

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    280 km/h
    174 mph Unrestricted
    270 km/h
    168 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    326 hp
    243 kW
  • Lightest
    1,417 kg
    3,124 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    230 hp/t
    172 kW/t
    4.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.5 L/100 km
    20.5 mpg US
    24.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.1 L/100 km
    25.8 mpg US
    31.0 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    696 km
    432 mi
  • Largest trunk
    420 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    70/100
  • Best economy score
    76/100
  • Best practicality score
    51/100

Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0

  • Highest torque
    463 Nm
    341 lb-ft
  • Lowest city consumption
    21.9 L/100 km
    10.7 mpg US
    12.9 mpg UK

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32VJaguarXJS Coupe6.0
Power
326hp243kW
318hp237kW
Torque
436Nm322lb-ft
463Nm341lb-ft
Curb weight
1,417kg3,124lb
1,825kg4,023lb
Gross weight
1,800kg3,968lb
2,175kg4,795lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Calculated
245 km/h
152 mph
To 99% top speed
74.9s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph
Calculated
94.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.3s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
17.2s
Calculated
29.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.0s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
22.2L/100 km10.6mpg US12.7mpg UK
21.9L/100 km10.7mpg US12.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.3s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
230hp/t172kW/t104hp/1000 lb
Calculated
174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
308Nm/t206lb-ft/ton
Calculated
254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
696km432mi
Calculated
685km425mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,217cc196cu in
5,994cc366cu in
Length
4,100mm161in
4,820mm190in
Width
1,850mm73in
1,793mm71in
Height
1,300mm51in
1,279mm50in
Wheelbase
2,400mm94in
2,588mm102in
Front track
1,512mm60in
1,489mm59in
Rear track
1,550mm61in
1,504mm59in
Trunk volume
420L
407L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
80L
89L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32VJaguar XJS Coupe 6.0PowerTorque
  • Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V6,000 rpm2,800 rpm6,250 rpm
JaguarXJS Coupe6.05,400 rpm3,750 rpm5,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32VJaguarXJS Coupe6.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.0 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.3 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
17.2 s
29.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Likely limited
245 km/h
152 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
5.9 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.8 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.3 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.3 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
177 km/h
110 mph
152 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V
326 hp
243 kW
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
318 hp
237 kW

Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V has 8 hp more than Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0 and Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V
436 Nm
322 lb-ft
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
463 Nm
341 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V
1,417 kg
3,124 lb
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
1,825 kg
4,023 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
245 km/h
152 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V5.3 s
JaguarXJS Coupe6.07.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V and Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0: 2.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V and Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
174 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V
696 km
432 mi
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
685 km
425 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V
326 hp
243 kW
5.3 s
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
318 hp
237 kW
7.4 s
245 km/h
152 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V
Power
326 hp
243 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,100 mm
161.4 in
Height
1,300 mm
51.2 in
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
Power
318 hp
237 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
407 L
14.4 cu ft
Length
4,820 mm
189.8 in
Height
1,279 mm
50.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V
Power
326 hp
243 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
Power
318 hp
237 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK

Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
5.3 s
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
174 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32VJaguarXJS Coupe6.0
Power
326 hp
243 kW
318 hp
237 kW
Torque
436 Nm
322 lb-ft
463 Nm
341 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.3 s
7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
280 km/h174 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
245 km/h
152 mph
Lightness
1,417 kg
3,124 lb
1,825 kg
4,023 lb
Fuel consumption
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,100 mm
161.4 in
Height
1,300 mm
51.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
407 L
14.4 cu ft
Length
4,820 mm
189.8 in
Height
1,279 mm
50.4 in
Range score
696 km
432 mi
685 km
425 mi
Trunk score
420 L
14.8 cu ft
407 L
14.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
174 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMaserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32VJaguar XJS Coupe 6.0
Consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK13 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.13 LC100 km22.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.39 LC100 mi36.61 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal1,950 L515 US gal429 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,019 LC/year3,413 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Is 408 kg lighter
  • Is 2.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 56 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 11 km (7 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 13 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0

  • Has 27 Nm more

Pros

  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V
Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.2 i V8 32V
2.0 24V Biturbo
VS
MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32VvsMaseratiGhibli II2.0 24V Biturbo
6.0
5.3
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0vsAston MartinVirage5.3
3.2 i V8 32V
Turbo 3.3
VS
MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32VvsPorsche911 (964)Turbo 3.3
6.0
3.0 Twin Turbo
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0vsNissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
3.2 i V8 32V
5.0 GT V8
VS
MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32VvsPorsche9285.0 GT V8
6.0
3.4 i V8 32V
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0vsFerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V
3.2 i V8 32V
3.4 V8
VS
MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32VvsFerrari348 TB3.4 V8
6.0
3.0 i 24V 4x4
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0vsMitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4
6.0
CL 500 V8
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0vsMercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8
3.2 i V8 32V
3.0 8V Turbo S
VS
MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32VvsPorsche9683.0 8V Turbo S
6.0
3.0i
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0vsBMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i
3.2 i V8 32V
3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
VS
MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32VvsMaserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V vs Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster