Car comparison

Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4vsJaguar XJS Coupe 6.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mitsubishi 3000 GT

3.0 i 24V 4x4

286 hp2972 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedCoupe1992-1993
VS

Jaguar XJS Coupe

6.0

318 hp5994 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe1991-1994

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,745 kg
    3,847 lb
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.0 L/100 km
    15.7 mpg US
    18.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.0 L/100 km
    26.1 mpg US
    31.4 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    65/100
  • Best practicality score
    51/100

Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0

  • Most powerful
    318 hp
    237 kW
  • Highest torque
    463 Nm
    341 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    174 hp/t
    130 kW/t
    5.7 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    407 L
  • Best economy score
    72/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
Power
286hp213kW
318hp237kW
Torque
407Nm300lb-ft
463Nm341lb-ft
Curb weight
1,745kg3,847lb
1,825kg4,023lb
Gross weight
2,120kg4,674lb
2,175kg4,795lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
245 km/h
152 mph
To 99% top speed
72.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
95.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.0s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
18.6s
Calculated
29.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.7s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK
21.9L/100 km10.7mpg US12.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.2s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton
Calculated
254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
685km425mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,972cc181cu in
5,994cc366cu in
Length
4,555mm179in
4,820mm190in
Width
1,840mm72in
1,793mm71in
Height
1,285mm51in
1,279mm50in
Wheelbase
2,470mm97in
2,588mm102in
Front track
1,560mm61in
1,489mm59in
Rear track
1,580mm62in
1,504mm59in
Trunk volume-
407L
Max trunk volume
160L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
75L
89L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0PowerTorque
  • Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x46,000 rpm3,000 rpm6,250 rpm
JaguarXJS Coupe6.05,400 rpm3,750 rpm5,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.7 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.0 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
18.6 s
29.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
245 km/h
152 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.6 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.1 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.2 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
173 km/h
108 mph
152 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4
286 hp
213 kW
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
318 hp
237 kW

Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0 has 32 hp more than Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4.

The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4 and Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0: 32 hp (24 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4
407 Nm
300 lb-ft
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
463 Nm
341 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4
1,745 kg
3,847 lb
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
1,825 kg
4,023 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
245 km/h
152 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x45.0 s
JaguarXJS Coupe6.07.4 s

Although Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0 has more power, Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4 and Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0: 2.4 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4
164 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
174 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4
286 hp
213 kW
5.0 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
318 hp
237 kW
7.4 s
245 km/h
152 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
160 L
5.7 cu ft
Length
4,555 mm
179.3 in
Height
1,285 mm
50.6 in
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
Power
318 hp
237 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
407 L
14.4 cu ft
Length
4,820 mm
189.8 in
Height
1,279 mm
50.4 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4JaguarXJS Coupe6.0
Power
286 hp
213 kW
318 hp
237 kW
Torque
407 Nm
300 lb-ft
463 Nm
341 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.0 s
7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
245 km/h
152 mph
Lightness
1,745 kg
3,847 lb
1,825 kg
4,023 lb
Fuel consumption
-
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
160 L
5.7 cu ft
Length
4,555 mm
179.3 in
Height
1,285 mm
50.6 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
407 L
14.4 cu ft
Length
4,820 mm
189.8 in
Height
1,279 mm
50.4 in
Range score
-
685 km
425 mi
Trunk score
160 L
5.7 cu ft
407 L
14.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
164 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
174 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XJS Coupe 6.0
Consumption13 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km22.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi36.61 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,950 L515 US gal429 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,413 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4

  • Is 80 kg lighter
  • Is 2.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0

  • Has 32 hp more
  • Has 56 Nm more
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 247 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4
Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0 i 24V 4x4
3.0 Twin Turbo
VS
Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4vsNissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
6.0
5.3
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0vsAston MartinVirage5.3
3.0 i 24V 4x4
3.0i
VS
Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4vsBMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i
3.0 i 24V 4x4
3.4 i V8 32V
VS
Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4vsFerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V
3.0 i 24V 4x4
5.3
VS
Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4vsJaguarXJS Coupe5.3
6.0
CL 500 V8
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0vsMercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8
3.0 i 24V 4x4
2.8 24V Biturbo
VS
Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4vsMaseratiGhibli II2.8 24V Biturbo
3.0 i 24V 4x4
3.0 i V6 Turbo
VS
Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4vsAlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
6.0
3.2 i V8 32V
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0vsMaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V
6.0
Turbo 3.3
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0vsPorsche911 (964)Turbo 3.3
3.0 i 24V 4x4
3.4 V8
VS
Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4vsFerrari348 TB3.4 V8
6.0
850Ci 5.4
VS
JaguarXJS Coupe6.0vsBMW8 Series (E31)850Ci 5.4
Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4 vs Jaguar XJS Coupe 6.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster