Volvo S90
Car comparison
Volvo S90 2.0 D4vsJaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019 D180
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019
D180
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S90 2.0 D4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions123 g/km
- Best estimated range1,170 km727 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lightest1,610 kg3,549 lb
- Best power-to-weight112 hp/t83 kW/t8.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS902.0 D4 | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,866kg4,114lb | 1,610kg3,549lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 74.6s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.6s Calculated | 35.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 267Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,170km727mi Calculated | 1,077km669mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,963mm195in | 4,678mm184in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,967mm77in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,583mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 152mm6in | 125mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 410L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 56L |
| CO2 emissions | 123g/km | 138g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S90 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | - | 5,000 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS902.0 D4 | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.6 s | 35.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 180 hp 134 kW |
Volvo S90 2.0 D4 has 10 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180 and Volvo S90 2.0 D4: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 1,866 kg 4,114 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 8.2 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 D4 and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 D4 and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 1,170 km 727 mi |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 1,077 km 669 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.2 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.4 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S90 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 D4 | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS902.0 D4 | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,866 kg 4,114 lb | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,170 km 727 mi | 1,077 km 669 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 123 g/km | 138 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S90 2.0 D4 | Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S90 2.0 D4
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 93 km (58 mi) more estimated range
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
- Emits 15 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 256 kg lighter
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























