Volvo S90
Car comparison
Volvo S90 2.0 T4vsJaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019 D180
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019
D180
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lightest1,610 kg3,549 lb
- Best power-to-weight112 hp/t83 kW/t8.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions138 g/km
- Best estimated range1,077 km669 mi
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score93/100
Volvo S90 2.0 T4
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS902.0 T4 | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,831kg4,037lb | 1,610kg3,549lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 74.6s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.5s Calculated | 35.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated | 267Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 821km510mi Calculated | 1,077km669mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,963mm195in | 4,678mm184in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,967mm77in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,583mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 152mm6in | 125mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 410L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 56L |
| CO2 emissions | 155g/km | 138g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S90 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 5,000 rpm | 1,700-4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS902.0 T4 | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.5 s | 35.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 180 hp 134 kW |
Volvo S90 2.0 T4 has 10 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180 and Volvo S90 2.0 T4: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 8.7 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 8.4 s |
Although Volvo S90 2.0 T4 has more power, Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180 and Volvo S90 2.0 T4: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180 and Volvo S90 2.0 T4: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 821 km 510 mi |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 1,077 km 669 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.7 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.4 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS902.0 T4 | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 821 km 510 mi | 1,077 km 669 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 155 g/km | 138 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S90 2.0 T4 | Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S90 2.0 T4
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 221 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 256 km (159 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 17 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























