BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20)
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320dvsVolvo S90 2.0 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S90
2.0 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions125 g/km
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score94/100
Volvo S90 2.0 T4
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | VolvoS902.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,831kg4,037lb |
| Gross weight | 2,170kg4,784lb | - |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 60.9s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 78.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.1s Calculated | 35.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 833km518mi Calculated | 821km510mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,709mm185in | 4,963mm195in |
| Width | 1,827mm72in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,851mm112in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,573mm62in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,587mm62in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | 152mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 125g/km | 155g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d: Power / Torque
- Volvo S90 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 5,000 rpm | 1,700-4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | VolvoS902.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.1 s | 35.5 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 6.9 s |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d and Volvo S90 2.0 T4: 1.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d and Volvo S90 2.0 T4: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 833 km 518 mi |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 821 km 510 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.9 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.7 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS902.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS902.0 T4 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d | VolvoS902.0 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 833 km 518 mi | 821 km 510 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 125 g/km | 155 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d | Volvo S90 2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Sedan (G20) 320d
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 291 kg lighter
- Is 1.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 12 km (8 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 30 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Volvo S90 2.0 T4
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























