Car comparison

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 B4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar E-Pace

2.0 P200

200 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2020
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 B4

197 hp1969 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2019-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    216 km/h
    134 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Lightest
    1,757 kg
    3,874 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    114 hp/t
    85 kW/t
    8.8 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    1,234 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    47/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4

  • Highest torque
    420 Nm
    310 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    155 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,203 km
    748 mi
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarE-Pace2.0 P200VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
Power
200hp149kW
197hp147kW
Torque
340Nm251lb-ft
420Nm310lb-ft
Curb weight
1,757kg3,874lb
1,950kg4,299lb
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
94.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
86.3s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.2s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
47.1s
Calculated
66.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.7s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.0s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
194Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
835km519mi
Calculated
1,203km748mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,984mm78in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,649mm65in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,635mm64in
1,668mm66in
Rear track
1,634mm64in
1,673mm66in
Ground clearance
204mm8in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
1,234L
505L
Max trunk volume
2,577L
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
69L
71L
CO2 emissions
186g/km
155g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4PowerTorque
  • Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P2005,500 rpm1,250 rpm5,750 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B44,000 rpm1,740-2,760 rpm5,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarE-Pace2.0 P200VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.7 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.2 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
47.1 s
66.5 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.0 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
200 hp
149 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
197 hp
147 kW

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 has 3 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
420 Nm
310 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
1,757 kg
3,874 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
1,950 kg
4,299 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
216 km/h
134 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P2008.2 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B48.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: 2.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
835 km
519 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
1,203 km
748 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
200 hp
149 kW
8.2 s
216 km/h
134 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
197 hp
147 kW
8.3 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
Power
197 hp
147 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
Power
197 hp
147 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
8.2 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarE-Pace2.0 P200VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
Power
200 hp
149 kW
197 hp
147 kW
Torque
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.2 s
8.3 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,757 kg
3,874 lb
1,950 kg
4,299 lb
Fuel consumption
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
835 km
519 mi
1,203 km
748 mi
CO2 score
186 g/km
155 g/km
Trunk score
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
Consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.35 LC100 km10.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.09 LC100 mi16.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal885 L234 US gal195 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,153 LC/year1,549 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Is 193 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 729 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4

  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 368 km (229 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 31 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster