Jaguar E-Pace
Car comparison
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 B4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed216 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,757 kg3,874 lb
- Best power-to-weight114 hp/t85 kW/t8.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk1,234 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions155 g/km
- Best estimated range1,203 km748 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 197hp147kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,757kg3,874lb | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 86.3s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 47.1s Calculated | 66.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 194Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 835km519mi Calculated | 1,203km748mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,395mm173in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,649mm65in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,635mm64in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,634mm64in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 204mm8in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 1,234L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,577L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 69L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 186g/km | 155g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,760 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 47.1 s | 66.5 s |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 197 hp 147 kW |
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 has 3 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 1,757 kg 3,874 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 8.2 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 835 km 519 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 1,203 km 748 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.2 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 197 hp 147 kW | 8.3 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 197 hp 147 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,757 kg 3,874 lb | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 835 km 519 mi | 1,203 km 748 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 186 g/km | 155 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 1,234 L 43.6 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.35 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,153 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200
- Has 3 hp more
- Is 193 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 729 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
- Has 80 Nm more
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 368 km (229 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 31 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























