Seat Altea Freetrack · Facelift 2009
Car comparison
Seat Altea Freetrack · Facelift 2009 2.0 TSIvsInfiniti QX70 3.0D V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonInfiniti QX70
3.0D V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Lightest1,661 kg3,662 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t95 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions197 g/km
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6
- Most powerful238 hp177 kW
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,047 km650 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | InfinitiQX703.0D V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 238hp177kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,661kg3,662lb | 2,175kg4,795lb |
| Gross weight | 2,205kg4,861lb | - |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.0s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 100.7s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.4s Calculated | 55.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated | 253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 1,047km650mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,493mm177in | 4,865mm192in |
| Width | 1,788mm70in | - |
| Height | 1,622mm64in | 1,680mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,576mm101in | 2,885mm114in |
| Front track | 1,542mm61in | 1,635mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,518mm60in | 1,640mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 490L | 410L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 197g/km | 225g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| InfinitiQX703.0D V6 | 3,750 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | InfinitiQX703.0D V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.4 s | 55.5 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 92 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
| InfinitiQX703.0D V6 | 238 hp 177 kW |
Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6 has 27 hp more than Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI and Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQX703.0D V6 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 1,661 kg 3,662 lb |
| InfinitiQX703.0D V6 | 2,175 kg 4,795 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| InfinitiQX703.0D V6 | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 7.6 s |
| InfinitiQX703.0D V6 | 8.3 s |
Although Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6 has more power, Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI and Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQX703.0D V6 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQX703.0D V6 | 109 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 714 km 444 mi |
| InfinitiQX703.0D V6 | 1,047 km 650 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.6 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| InfinitiQX703.0D V6 | 238 hp 177 kW | 8.3 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQX703.0D V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| InfinitiQX703.0D V6 |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| InfinitiQX703.0D V6 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQX703.0D V6 | 109 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | InfinitiQX703.0D V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 238 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,661 kg 3,662 lb | 2,175 kg 4,795 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 1,047 km 650 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 197 g/km | 225 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI | Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI
- Is 514 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
- Emits 28 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 270 Nm more
- Has 332 km (206 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























