AUDI Q3 I (8U)
Car comparison
AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSIvsSeat Altea Freetrack · Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Altea Freetrack · Facelift 2009
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,640 kg3,616 lb
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions179 g/km
- Best estimated range831 km516 mi
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score86/100
Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best practicality score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,640kg3,616lb | 1,661kg3,662lb |
| Gross weight | 2,165kg4,773lb | 2,205kg4,861lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 80.9s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.4s Calculated | 39.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 831km516mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,385mm173in | 4,493mm177in |
| Width | 1,831mm72in | 1,788mm70in |
| Height | 1,608mm63in | 1,622mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,603mm102in | 2,576mm101in |
| Front track | 1,571mm62in | 1,542mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,518mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 490L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 179g/km | 197g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 5,000-6,200 rpm | 1,800-4,900 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.4 s | 39.4 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 147 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 1,661 kg 3,662 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 6.9 s |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI and Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI and Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 831 km 516 mi |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 6.9 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.6 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | 1,661 kg 3,662 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 831 km 516 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 179 g/km | 197 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI | Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 21 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 117 km (73 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 18 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























