AUDI Q5 I (8R)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSIvsSeat Altea Freetrack · Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Altea Freetrack · Facelift 2009
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions159 g/km
- Best estimated range1,043 km648 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,661 kg3,662 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t95 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk490 L
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,910kg4,211lb | 1,661kg3,662lb |
| Gross weight | 2,490kg5,490lb | 2,205kg4,861lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.8s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 81.0s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.0s Calculated | 39.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated | 169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,043km648mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,629mm182in | 4,493mm177in |
| Width | 1,898mm75in | 1,788mm70in |
| Height | 1,653mm65in | 1,622mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,807mm111in | 2,576mm101in |
| Front track | 1,617mm64in | 1,542mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,613mm64in | 1,518mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 490L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,480L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 159g/km | 197g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 4,300-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.0 s | 39.4 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 147 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 1,910 kg 4,211 lb |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 1,661 kg 3,662 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 7.1 s |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI and Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI and Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 1,043 km 648 mi |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.1 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.6 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,910 kg 4,211 lb | 1,661 kg 3,662 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,043 km 648 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 159 g/km | 197 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI | Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 329 km (205 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 38 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI
- Is 249 kg lighter
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























