Seat Altea Freetrack · Facelift 2009
Car comparison
Seat Altea Freetrack · Facelift 2009 2.0 TSIvsSeat Tarraco 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Tarraco
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions147 g/km
- Best estimated range1,071 km666 mi
- Largest trunk760 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Lightest1,661 kg3,662 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t95 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Best performance score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | SeatTarraco2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,661kg3,662lb | 1,741kg3,838lb |
| Gross weight | 2,205kg4,861lb | 2,410kg5,313lb |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.0s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 83.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.4s Calculated | 50.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t81kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 1,071km666mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,493mm177in | 4,735mm186in |
| Width | 1,788mm70in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,622mm64in | 1,674mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,576mm101in | 2,790mm110in |
| Front track | 1,542mm61in | 1,575mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,518mm60in | 1,564mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 490L | 760L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 197g/km | 147g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | SeatTarraco2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.4 s | 50.8 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 92 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI has 21 hp more than Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI and Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 1,661 kg 3,662 lb |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 1,741 kg 3,838 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 7.6 s |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI and Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI and Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI: 2.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 714 km 444 mi |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 1,071 km 666 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.6 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI | SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,661 kg 3,662 lb | 1,741 kg 3,838 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 1,071 km 666 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 197 g/km | 147 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | 760 L 26.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI | Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TSI
- Has 21 hp more
- Is 80 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI
- Has 120 Nm more
- Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 357 km (222 mi) more estimated range
- Has 270 L more trunk volume
- Emits 50 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























