AUDI Q3 I (8U)
Car comparison
AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSIvsAUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI Hybrid
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012
2.0 TFSI Hybrid
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Lightest1,640 kg3,616 lb
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score52/100
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI Hybrid
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions159 g/km
- Best estimated range1,043 km648 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,640kg3,616lb | 1,910kg4,211lb |
| Gross weight | 2,165kg4,773lb | 2,490kg5,490lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 85.7s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.4s Calculated | 35.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 831km516mi Calculated | 1,043km648mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,385mm173in | 4,629mm182in |
| Width | 1,831mm72in | 1,898mm75in |
| Height | 1,608mm63in | 1,655mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,603mm102in | 2,807mm111in |
| Front track | 1,571mm62in | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,614mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 540L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,560L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 72L |
| CO2 emissions | 179g/km | 159g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI Hybrid: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 5,000-6,200 rpm | 1,800-4,900 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid | 4,300-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.4 s | 35.0 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid | 211 hp 157 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid | 1,910 kg 4,211 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 6.9 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI and AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI Hybrid: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI Hybrid and AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 831 km 516 mi |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid | 1,043 km 648 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 6.9 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.1 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | 1,910 kg 4,211 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 831 km 516 mi | 1,043 km 648 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 179 g/km | 159 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI | AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI Hybrid |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI
- Is 270 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI Hybrid
- Has 50 Nm more
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 212 km (132 mi) more estimated range
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
- Emits 20 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























