Car comparison

Subaru Forester IV 2.0vsInfiniti QX70 3.0D V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Subaru Forester IV

2.0

241 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDTurbochargedSUV2012-2015
VS

Infiniti QX70

3.0D V6

238 hp2993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2013-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Subaru Forester IV 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    221 km/h
    137 mph
  • Most powerful
    241 hp
    180 kW
  • Lightest
    1,613 kg
    3,556 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    149 hp/t
    111 kW/t
    6.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.5 L/100 km
    27.7 mpg US
    33.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    488 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6

  • Highest torque
    550 Nm
    406 lb-ft
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.8 L/100 km
    21.8 mpg US
    26.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,047 km
    650 mi

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSubaruForester IV2.0InfinitiQX703.0D V6
Power
241hp180kW
238hp177kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
550Nm406lb-ft
Curb weight
1,613kg3,556lb
2,175kg4,795lb
Gross weight
1,850kg4,079lb
-
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
To 99% top speed
79.8s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph
Calculated
107.4s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
36.6s
Calculated
58.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
109hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton
Calculated
253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
706km439mi
Calculated
1,047km650mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
2,993cc183cu in
Length
4,595mm181in
4,865mm192in
Width
1,795mm71in
2,134mm84in
Height
1,735mm68in
1,680mm66in
Wheelbase
2,640mm104in
2,885mm114in
Front track
1,545mm61in
1,635mm64in
Rear track
1,550mm61in
1,640mm65in
Ground clearance
220mm9in
-
Trunk volume
488L
410L
Max trunk volume
1,577L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
90L
CO2 emissions-
225g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Subaru Forester IV 2.0Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6PowerTorque
  • Subaru Forester IV 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SubaruForester IV2.05,600 rpm2,400 rpm5,850 rpm
InfinitiQX703.0D V63,750 rpm1,750 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSubaruForester IV2.0InfinitiQX703.0D V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
36.6 s
58.3 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
139 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IV2.0
241 hp
180 kW
InfinitiQX703.0D V6
238 hp
177 kW

Subaru Forester IV 2.0 has 3 hp more than Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6.

The biggest power difference is between Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6 and Subaru Forester IV 2.0: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IV2.0
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
InfinitiQX703.0D V6
550 Nm
406 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IV2.0
1,613 kg
3,556 lb
InfinitiQX703.0D V6
2,175 kg
4,795 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IV2.0
221 km/h
137 mph
InfinitiQX703.0D V6
212 km/h
132 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IV2.07.5 s
InfinitiQX703.0D V68.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Subaru Forester IV 2.0 and Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IV2.0
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
InfinitiQX703.0D V6
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IV2.0
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
InfinitiQX703.0D V6
109 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IV2.0
706 km
439 mi
InfinitiQX703.0D V6
1,047 km
650 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SubaruForester IV2.0
241 hp
180 kW
7.5 s
221 km/h
137 mph
InfinitiQX703.0D V6
238 hp
177 kW
8.3 s
212 km/h
132 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SubaruForester IV2.0
Power
241 hp
180 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
488 L
17.2 cu ft
Length
4,595 mm
180.9 in
Height
1,735 mm
68.3 in
InfinitiQX703.0D V6
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
410 L
14.5 cu ft
Length
4,865 mm
191.5 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SubaruForester IV2.0
Power
241 hp
180 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
InfinitiQX703.0D V6
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

Subaru Forester IV 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SubaruForester IV2.0
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
7.5 s
InfinitiQX703.0D V6
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SubaruForester IV2.0
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
InfinitiQX703.0D V6
109 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSubaruForester IV2.0InfinitiQX703.0D V6
Power
241 hp
180 kW
238 hp
177 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
8.3 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Lightness
1,613 kg
3,556 lb
2,175 kg
4,795 lb
Fuel consumption
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
488 L
17.2 cu ft
Length
4,595 mm
180.9 in
Height
1,735 mm
68.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
410 L
14.5 cu ft
Length
4,865 mm
191.5 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in
Range score
706 km
439 mi
1,047 km
650 mi
CO2 score
-
225 g/km
Trunk score
488 L
17.2 cu ft
410 L
14.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
109 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSubaru Forester IV 2.0Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6
Consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.88 LC100 km15.05 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.94 LC100 mi24.22 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,231 LC/year2,258 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Subaru Forester IV 2.0

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Is 562 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 40 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 78 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6

  • Has 200 Nm more
  • Has 341 km (212 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Subaru Forester IV 2.0
Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
Sport 2.0 T
VS
SubaruForester IV2.0vsSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
3.0D V6
GL 350 BlueTEC
VS
InfinitiQX703.0D V6vsMercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 350 BlueTEC
2.0
2.5 Turbo
VS
SubaruForester IV2.0vsSubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
3.0D V6
3.5 V6
VS
InfinitiQX703.0D V6vsNissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
2.0
2.5 XT
VS
SubaruForester IV2.0vsSubaruForester III2.5 XT
3.0D V6
3.0 TDI V6
VS
InfinitiQX703.0D V6vsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TDI V6
2.0
2.5 i 16V Turbo
VS
SubaruForester IV2.0vsSubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo
3.0D V6
2.0 TSI
VS
InfinitiQX703.0D V6vsVolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
3.0D V6
28i
VS
InfinitiQX703.0D V6vsBMWX3 (F25)28i
3.0D V6
2.0 D5
VS
InfinitiQX703.0D V6vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
2.0
28i
VS
SubaruForester IV2.0vsBMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i
3.0D V6
GLK 350 CDI V6
VS
InfinitiQX703.0D V6vsMercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6
Subaru Forester IV 2.0 vs Infiniti QX70 3.0D V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster