BMW X1 (E84 LCI) · Facelift 2012
Car comparison
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) · Facelift 2012 28ivsSubaru Forester IV 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSubaru Forester IV
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range863 km536 mi
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score87/100
Subaru Forester IV 2.0
- Lightest1,613 kg3,556 lb
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk488 L
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | SubaruForester IV2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 241hp180kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | 1,613kg3,556lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 79.8s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.5s Calculated | 36.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t109kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 210Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 863km536mi Calculated | 706km439mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,477mm176in | 4,595mm181in |
| Width | 1,798mm71in | 1,795mm71in |
| Height | 1,545mm61in | 1,735mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,529mm60in | 1,550mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 220mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 488L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,350L | 1,577L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 171g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i: Power / Torque
- Subaru Forester IV 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,250-4,800 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| SubaruForester IV2.0 | 5,600 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | SubaruForester IV2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.5 s | 36.6 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 245 hp 183 kW |
| SubaruForester IV2.0 | 241 hp 180 kW |
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i has 4 hp more than Subaru Forester IV 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Subaru Forester IV 2.0 and BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| SubaruForester IV2.0 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb |
| SubaruForester IV2.0 | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| SubaruForester IV2.0 | 221 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 6.4 s |
| SubaruForester IV2.0 | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i and Subaru Forester IV 2.0: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| SubaruForester IV2.0 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i and Subaru Forester IV 2.0: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| SubaruForester IV2.0 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 863 km 536 mi |
| SubaruForester IV2.0 | 706 km 439 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.4 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| SubaruForester IV2.0 | 241 hp 180 kW | 7.5 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SubaruForester IV2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| SubaruForester IV2.0 |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| SubaruForester IV2.0 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| SubaruForester IV2.0 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | SubaruForester IV2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 241 hp 180 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 863 km 536 mi | 706 km 439 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 171 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 488 L 17.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i | Subaru Forester IV 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 14.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 2,231 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 157 km (98 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Subaru Forester IV 2.0
- Is 57 kg lighter
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 68 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























