Car comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6vsInfiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

Polestar 3.0 T6

350 hp2953 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2014-2015
VS

Infiniti Q50

S 3.5 V6

364 hp3498 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSedan2013-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,770 kg
    3,902 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    198 hp/t
    147 kW/t
    5.1 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best performance score
    72/100

Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6

  • Most powerful
    364 hp
    271 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    159 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    510 L
  • Best economy score
    89/100
  • Best practicality score
    75/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
Power
350hp261kW
364hp271kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,770kg3,902lb
1,853kg4,085lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
71.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
53.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.9s
5.4s
0-200 km/h
17.7s
16.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.7s
Calculated
5.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.1s
Calculated
13.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
198hp/t147kW/t90hp/1000 lb
Calculated
196hp/t146kW/t89hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton
Calculated
189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
662km411mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
2,953cc180cu in
3,498cc213cu in
Length
4,635mm182in
4,783mm188in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,824mm72in
Height
1,484mm58in
1,443mm57in
Wheelbase
2,776mm109in
2,850mm112in
Front track
1,578mm62in
1,519mm60in
Rear track
1,575mm62in
1,529mm60in
Ground clearance
124mm5in
-
Trunk volume
380L
510L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
-
CO2 emissions
243g/km
159g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6PowerTorque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6: Power / Torque
  • Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T65,700 rpm2,800-4,750 rpm6,500 rpm
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V66,500 rpm5,200 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.7 s
5.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.9 s
5.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
17.7 s
16.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
5.6 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.5 s
8.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.0 s
11.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.1 s
13.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
176 km/h
109 mph
182 km/h
113 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
350 hp
261 kW
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
364 hp
271 kW

Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6 has 14 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6 and Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
1,853 kg
4,085 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T64.9 s
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V65.4 s

Although Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6 has more power, Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6 and Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6: 3.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
198 hp/t
147 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
196 hp/t
146 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
350 hp
261 kW
4.9 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
364 hp
271 kW
5.4 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
Power
350 hp
261 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
Power
364 hp
271 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Length
4,783 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
Power
350 hp
261 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
Power
364 hp
271 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
4.9 s
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
5.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
198 hp/t
147 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
196 hp/t
146 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
Power
350 hp
261 kW
364 hp
271 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.9 s
5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
1,853 kg
4,085 lb
Fuel consumption
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Length
4,783 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Range score
662 km
411 mi
-
CO2 score
243 g/km
159 g/km
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
198 hp/t
147 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
196 hp/t
146 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6
Consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.85 LC100 km11.90 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi28.73 LC100 mi19.15 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,678 LC/year1,785 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6

  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Is 83 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6

  • Has 14 hp more
  • Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 130 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 84 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S60 II Polestar 3.0 T6
Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Polestar 3.0 T6
3.0 T6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6vsVolvoS60 II3.0 T6
S 3.5 V6
AMG C 450 V6
VS
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6
Polestar 3.0 T6
R 2.5i 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6vsVolvoS60R 2.5i 20V
S 3.5 V6
4.2 BiTDI V8 clean diesel
VS
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6vsAUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20134.2 BiTDI V8 clean diesel
Polestar 3.0 T6
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6vsAUDIS4 (B8)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6
S 3.5 V6
4.2 TDI V8 clean diesel
VS
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6vsAUDIA8 (D4/4H)Facelift 20134.2 TDI V8 clean diesel
Polestar 3.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6vsVolvoS902.0 T6
S 3.5 V6
E 400 V6 3.5
VS
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 400 V6 3.5
S 3.5 V6
460 V8
VS
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6vsLexusLS IVFacelift 2012460 V8
S 3.5 V6
3.0 V6
VS
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6vsJaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6
Polestar 3.0 T6
3.0 V6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6vsJaguarXE (X760)3.0 V6
Polestar 3.0 T6
3.8 V8
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6vsMaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.8 V8
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6 vs Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster