Infiniti Q50
Car comparison
Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6vsJaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260)
3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful364 hp271 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions159 g/km
- Largest trunk510 L
- Best economy score89/100
Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight199 hp/t148 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score69/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 364hp271kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,853kg4,085lb | 1,710kg3,770lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,330kg5,137lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 53.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 53.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.1s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 196hp/t146kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated | 199hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated | 263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 892km554mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 2,995cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,783mm188in | 4,954mm195in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850mm112in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,519mm60in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,529mm60in | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 116mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 510L | 505L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 74L |
| CO2 emissions | 159g/km | 198g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.1 s | 16.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 364 hp 271 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6 has 24 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6 and Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6: 24 hp (18 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 1,853 kg 4,085 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 5.4 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | 5.4 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6 and Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 364 hp 271 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 364 hp 271 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,853 kg 4,085 lb | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 892 km 554 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 159 g/km | 198 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 510 L 18.0 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6 | Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6
- Has 24 hp more
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
- Emits 39 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 143 kg lighter
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























