Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 450 V6vsInfiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonInfiniti Q50
S 3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 450 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful367 hp274 kW
- Highest torque520 Nm384 lb-ft
- Lightest1,615 kg3,560 lb
- Best power-to-weight227 hp/t169 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions159 g/km
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6 | InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367hp274kW | 364hp271kW |
| Torque | 520Nm384lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,853kg4,085lb |
| Gross weight | 2,225kg4,905lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 46.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 53.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.3s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 196hp/t146kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 322Nm/t215lb-ft/ton Calculated | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,756mm187in | 4,783mm188in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,824mm72in |
| Height | 1,426mm56in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,850mm112in |
| Front track | 1,609mm63in | 1,519mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,529mm60in |
| Trunk volume | - | 510L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| CO2 emissions | 183g/km | 159g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 450 V6: Power / Torque
- Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6 | 5,500-6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6 | InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.3 s | 16.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 189 km/h 118 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6 | 367 hp 274 kW |
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 364 hp 271 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 450 V6 has 3 hp more than Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 450 V6: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6 | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6 | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 1,853 kg 4,085 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6 | 4.9 s |
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 5.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 450 V6 and Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 450 V6: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6 | 367 hp 274 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 364 hp 271 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 450 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6 | InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp 274 kW | 364 hp 271 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | 1,853 kg 4,085 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 183 g/km | 159 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 510 L 18.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 450 V6 | Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 450 V6
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 170 Nm more
- Is 238 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 24 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























