Car comparison

Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.8 V8vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156)

3.8 V8

350 hp3798 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2013-2016
VS

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

Polestar 3.0 T6

350 hp2953 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2014-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.8 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    315 km/h
    196 mph Unrestricted
    307 km/h
    191 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    350 hp
    261 kW
  • Highest torque
    710 Nm
    524 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    672 km
    418 mi
  • Largest trunk
    530 L
  • Best overall score
    80/100
  • Best performance score
    81/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6

  • Lightest
    1,770 kg
    3,902 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    198 hp/t
    147 kW/t
    5.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.2 L/100 km
    23.1 mpg US
    27.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    243 g/km
  • Best economy score
    79/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.8 V8VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
Power
350hp261kW
350hp261kW
Torque
710Nm524lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,900kg4,189lb
1,770kg3,902lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
307 km/h191 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
61.8s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
71.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.7s
4.9s
0-200 km/h
12.8s
Calculated
17.7s
0-60 mph
4.5s
Calculated
4.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
17.6L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
12.5s
Calculated
13.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
184hp/t137kW/t84hp/1000 lb
Calculated
198hp/t147kW/t90hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
374Nm/t250lb-ft/ton
Calculated
282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
672km418mi
Calculated
662km411mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,798cc232cu in
2,953cc180cu in
Length
5,262mm207in
4,635mm182in
Width
1,948mm77in
1,865mm73in
Height
1,481mm58in
1,484mm58in
Wheelbase
3,171mm125in
2,776mm109in
Front track
1,634mm64in
1,578mm62in
Rear track
1,647mm65in
1,575mm62in
Ground clearance-
124mm5in
Trunk volume
530L
380L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
80L
68L
CO2 emissions
278g/km
243g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.8 V8Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6PowerTorque
  • Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.8 V8: Power / Torque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.8 V86,800 rpm2,250-3,500 rpm7,050 rpm
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T65,700 rpm2,800-4,750 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.8 V8VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.5 s
4.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.7 s
4.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.8 s
17.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
307 km/h191 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
5.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
8.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.6 s
11.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.5 s
13.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
197 km/h
122 mph
176 km/h
109 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.8 V8
350 hp
261 kW
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
350 hp
261 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.8 V8
710 Nm
524 lb-ft
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.8 V8
1,900 kg
4,189 lb
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
1,770 kg
3,902 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.8 V8
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
307 km/h191 mph
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.8 V84.7 s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T64.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.8 V8 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.8 V8
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6 and Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.8 V8: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.8 V8
184 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
198 hp/t
147 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.8 V8
672 km
418 mi
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
662 km
411 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.8 V8
350 hp
261 kW
4.7 s
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
307 km/h191 mph
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
350 hp
261 kW
4.9 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.8 V8
Power
350 hp
261 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
307 km/h191 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
5,262 mm
207.2 in
Height
1,481 mm
58.3 in
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
Power
350 hp
261 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.8 V8
Power
350 hp
261 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
307 km/h191 mph
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
Power
350 hp
261 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK

Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.8 V8
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
4.7 s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
4.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.8 V8
184 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
198 hp/t
147 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.8 V8VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
Power
350 hp
261 kW
350 hp
261 kW
Torque
710 Nm
524 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.7 s
4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
307 km/h191 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,900 kg
4,189 lb
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
Fuel consumption
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
5,262 mm
207.2 in
Height
1,481 mm
58.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Range score
672 km
418 mi
662 km
411 mi
CO2 score
278 g/km
243 g/km
Trunk score
530 L
18.7 cu ft
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
184 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
198 hp/t
147 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMaserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.8 V8Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6
Consumption11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.83 LC100 km17.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi33.51 LC100 mi28.73 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,124 LC/year2,678 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.8 V8

  • Has 210 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 11 km (7 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 150 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6

  • Is 130 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 35 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.8 V8
Volvo S60 II Polestar 3.0 T6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.8 V8
S Q4 3.0 GDI
VS
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.8 V8vsMaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)Facelift 2016S Q4 3.0 GDI
Polestar 3.0 T6
3.0 T6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6vsVolvoS60 II3.0 T6
3.8 V8
4.7
VS
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.8 V8vsMaseratiQuattroporte S4.7
Polestar 3.0 T6
R 2.5i 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6vsVolvoS60R 2.5i 20V
3.8 V8
4.7
VS
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.8 V8vsMaseratiQuattroporte Sport GT S4.7
Polestar 3.0 T6
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6vsAUDIS4 (B8)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6
3.8 V8
4.2 i V8 32V
VS
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.8 V8vsMaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V
Polestar 3.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6vsVolvoS902.0 T6
3.8 V8
3.2 V8 32V
VS
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.8 V8vsMaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V
Polestar 3.0 T6
E 400 V6 3.5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 400 V6 3.5
3.8 V8
4.9
VS
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.8 V8vsMaseratiQuattroporte III4.9
Polestar 3.0 T6
C 400 V6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 400 V6
Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.8 V8 vs Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster