Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6vsVolvo S90 2.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S90
2.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful350 hp261 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,770 kg3,902 lb
- Best power-to-weight198 hp/t147 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score72/100
Volvo S90 2.0 T6
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions177 g/km
- Best estimated range789 km491 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | VolvoS902.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 350hp261kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 1,930kg4,255lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,360kg5,203lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 61.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.7s | 18.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 198hp/t147kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 662km411mi Calculated | 789km491mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,953cc180cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 4,963mm195in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,578mm62in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | 152mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 243g/km | 177g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6: Power / Torque
- Volvo S90 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,800-4,750 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,200-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | VolvoS902.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.7 s | 18.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 13.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 109 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 350 hp 261 kW |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6 has 40 hp more than Volvo S90 2.0 T6.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 T6 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 4.9 s |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6 and Volvo S90 2.0 T6: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S90 2.0 T6 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 198 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 662 km 411 mi |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 789 km 491 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 350 hp 261 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS902.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS902.0 T6 |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | 198 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoS902.0 T6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6 | VolvoS902.0 T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 350 hp 261 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 662 km 411 mi | 789 km 491 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 243 g/km | 177 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 198 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6 | Volvo S90 2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 3.0 T6
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 37 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo S90 2.0 T6
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 128 km (79 mi) more estimated range
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
- Emits 66 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























