Car comparison

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsHyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) · Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-60

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

200 hp3283 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present
VS

Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) · Facelift 2020

2.2 CRDi

202 hp2151 ccDieselFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2020-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    212 km/h
    132 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DHyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
Power
200hp149kW
202hp151kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
440Nm325lb-ft
Curb weight
1,905kg4,200lb
1,871kg4,125lb
Gross weight
2,500kg5,512lb
2,550kg5,622lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Calculated
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
96.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
91.8s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
9.0s
0-200 km/h
44.1s
Calculated
70.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
8.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,184km736mi
Calculated
1,196km743mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,283cc200cu in
2,151cc131cu in
Length
4,745mm187in
4,785mm188in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,900mm75in
Height
1,687mm66in
1,685mm66in
Wheelbase
2,870mm113in
2,765mm109in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,651mm65in
Rear track
1,645mm65in
1,661mm65in
Ground clearance
175mm7in
176mm7in
Trunk volume
477L
831L
Max trunk volume
1,726L
1,704L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
67L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DHyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDiPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
  • Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D3,000-4,200 rpm1,400-3,000 rpm4,450 rpm
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi3,800 rpm1,750-2,750 rpm4,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DHyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
8.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
9.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
44.1 s
70.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Limited
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
16.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
137 km/h
85 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
200 hp
149 kW
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
202 hp
151 kW

Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi has 2 hp more than Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
440 Nm
325 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,905 kg
4,200 lb
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
1,871 kg
4,125 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D8.4 s
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi9.0 s

Although Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi has more power, Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
108 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,184 km
736 mi
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
1,196 km
743 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
200 hp
149 kW
8.4 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
202 hp
151 kW
9.0 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
831 L
29.3 cu ft
Length
4,785 mm
188.4 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
8.4 s
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
9.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
108 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DHyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
Power
200 hp
149 kW
202 hp
151 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
440 Nm
325 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
9.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,905 kg
4,200 lb
1,871 kg
4,125 lb
Fuel consumption
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
831 L
29.3 cu ft
Length
4,785 mm
188.4 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
Range score
1,184 km
736 mi
1,196 km
743 mi
Trunk score
477 L
16.8 cu ft
831 L
29.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
108 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DHyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi
Consumption4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.58 LC100 km9.80 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.80 LC100 mi15.77 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used735 L194 US gal162 UK gal840 L222 US gal185 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,286 LC/year1,470 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Is 34 kg lighter
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 13 km (8 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 354 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) 2.2 CRDi
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.2 CRDi
2.2 CRDi
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDivsHyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.2 CRDi
1.6T
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDivsHyundaiKona II1.6T
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0d
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsSeatTarraco2.0 TDI
2.2 CRDi
350h
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDivsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
40 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
2.2 CRDi
380 TSI
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDivsVolkswagenTalagon380 TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
2.2 CRDi
2.5
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDivsToyotaRAV4 V2.5
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D vs Hyundai Santa Fe IV (TM) · Facelift 2020 2.2 CRDi - car comparison - FastVsFaster