Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5vsHyundai Santa Fe III (DM) · Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T5

250 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) · Facelift 2015

3.3 MPi

270 hp3342 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.5 L/100 km
    24.8 mpg US
    29.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    171 g/km
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
Power
250hp186kW
270hp201kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
318Nm235lb-ft
Curb weight
1,852kg4,083lb
1,758kg3,876lb
Gross weight
2,370kg5,225lb
2,510kg5,534lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
74.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
89.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.9s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
34.8s
Calculated
41.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
181Nm/t121lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
811km504mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
3,342cc204cu in
Length
4,688mm185in
4,700mm185in
Width
1,902mm75in
1,880mm74in
Height
1,658mm65in
1,680mm66in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,700mm106in
Front track
1,668mm66in
1,633mm64in
Rear track
1,673mm66in
1,644mm65in
Ground clearance
216mm9in
-
Trunk volume
505L
1,680L
Max trunk volume
1,432L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
-
CO2 emissions
171g/km
245g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPiPowerTorque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
  • Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi6,400 rpm5,300 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.9 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.8 s
41.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
270 hp
201 kW

Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi has 20 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 and Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
318 Nm
235 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
1,852 kg
4,083 lb
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
1,758 kg
3,876 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T56.9 s
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi8.5 s

Although Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi has more power, Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 and Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi: 1.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 and Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi: 3.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
6.9 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
270 hp
201 kW
8.5 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
Power
270 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,680 L
59.3 cu ft
Length
4,700 mm
185.0 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
Power
270 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
6.9 s
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
Power
250 hp
186 kW
270 hp
201 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
318 Nm
235 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.9 s
8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,852 kg
4,083 lb
1,758 kg
3,876 lb
Fuel consumption
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,680 L
59.3 cu ft
Length
4,700 mm
185.0 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in
Range score
811 km
504 mi
-
CO2 score
171 g/km
245 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
1,680 L
59.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T5Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi
Consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.95 LC100 km18.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.84 LC100 mi29.57 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,943 LC/year2,756 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Has 32 Nm more
  • Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 3.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Emits 74 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Is 94 kg lighter
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 1,175 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) 3.3 MPi
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
3.3 MPi
2.2 CRDi
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPivsHyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
3.3 MPi
450d V8
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPivsLexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8
2.0 T5
2.0t
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-Pace2.0t
3.3 MPi
550T
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPivsChevroletEquinox III550T
2.0 T5
2.0
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
3.3 MPi
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPivsFordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
2.0 T5
2.0 P250
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
2.0 T5
2.0 BiTDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
3.3 MPi
GLS 350d
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPivsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d
2.0 T5
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 vs Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) · Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi - car comparison - FastVsFaster