Volvo XC60 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5vsJaguar F-Pace 2.0t
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace
2.0t
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions163 g/km
- Best estimated range887 km551 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | JaguarF-Pace2.0t |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,852kg4,083lb | 1,710kg3,770lb |
| Gross weight | 2,370kg5,225lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 74.6s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.7s Calculated | 36.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 811km504mi Calculated | 887km551mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,688mm185in | 4,746mm187in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 2,070mm81in |
| Height | 1,658mm65in | 1,667mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,668mm66in | 1,641mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,673mm66in | 1,654mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 216mm9in | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,432L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 171g/km | 163g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | JaguarF-Pace2.0t |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.7 s | 36.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 250 hp 186 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 1,852 kg 4,083 lb |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 6.9 s |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 811 km 504 mi |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 887 km 551 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.8 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | JaguarF-Pace2.0t | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,852 kg 4,083 lb | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 811 km 504 mi | 887 km 551 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 171 g/km | 163 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 | Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 142 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 77 km (48 mi) more estimated range
- Has 145 L more trunk volume
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























