Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5vsJaguar F-Pace 2.0t

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T5

250 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Jaguar F-Pace

2.0t

250 hp1997 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.8 s
  • Highest torque
    365 Nm
    269 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,710 kg
    3,770 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    146 hp/t
    109 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    163 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    887 km
    551 mi
  • Largest trunk
    650 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5JaguarF-Pace2.0t
Power
250hp186kW
250hp186kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
365Nm269lb-ft
Curb weight
1,852kg4,083lb
1,710kg3,770lb
Gross weight
2,370kg5,225lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
74.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
74.6s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.9s
6.8s
0-200 km/h
34.7s
Calculated
36.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
6.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
811km504mi
Calculated
887km551mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,688mm185in
4,746mm187in
Width
1,902mm75in
2,070mm81in
Height
1,658mm65in
1,667mm66in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,668mm66in
1,641mm65in
Rear track
1,673mm66in
1,654mm65in
Ground clearance
216mm9in
213mm8in
Trunk volume
505L
650L
Max trunk volume
1,432L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
63L
CO2 emissions
171g/km
163g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5Jaguar F-Pace 2.0tPowerTorque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm
JaguarF-Pace2.0t5,500 rpm1,200-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5JaguarF-Pace2.0t
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
6.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.9 s
6.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.7 s
36.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
250 hp
186 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
365 Nm
269 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
1,852 kg
4,083 lb
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
1,710 kg
3,770 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T56.9 s
JaguarF-Pace2.0t6.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
811 km
504 mi
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
887 km
551 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
6.9 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
250 hp
186 kW
6.8 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,746 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,667 mm
65.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
6.9 s
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
6.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5JaguarF-Pace2.0t
Power
250 hp
186 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.9 s
6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,852 kg
4,083 lb
1,710 kg
3,770 lb
Fuel consumption
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,746 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,667 mm
65.6 in
Range score
811 km
504 mi
887 km
551 mi
CO2 score
171 g/km
163 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T5Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t
Consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.95 LC100 km12.42 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.84 LC100 mi20.00 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,943 LC/year1,864 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t

  • Has 15 Nm more
  • Is 142 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 77 km (48 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 145 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 8 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 vs Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t - car comparison - FastVsFaster