Car comparison

Subaru Forester IV · Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 TvsJaguar F-Pace 2.0t

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Subaru Forester IV · Facelift 2016

Sport 2.0 T

240 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2016-2018
VS

Jaguar F-Pace

2.0t

250 hp1997 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.8 s
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Highest torque
    365 Nm
    269 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    163 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    887 km
    551 mi
  • Largest trunk
    650 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TJaguarF-Pace2.0t
Power
240hp179kW
250hp186kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
365Nm269lb-ft
Curb weight
1,624kg3,580lb
1,710kg3,770lb
Gross weight
2,110kg4,652lb
-
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
79.1s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph
Calculated
74.6s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
6.8s
0-200 km/h
36.4s
Calculated
36.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
6.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
706km439mi
Calculated
887km551mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,595mm181in
4,746mm187in
Width
1,795mm71in
2,070mm81in
Height
1,735mm68in
1,667mm66in
Wheelbase
2,640mm104in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,545mm61in
1,641mm65in
Rear track
1,555mm61in
1,654mm65in
Ground clearance
220mm9in
213mm8in
Trunk volume
505L
650L
Max trunk volume
1,557L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
63L
CO2 emissions
197g/km
163g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 TJaguar F-Pace 2.0tPowerTorque
  • Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T5,600 rpm2,400-3,600 rpm5,850 rpm
JaguarF-Pace2.0t5,500 rpm1,200-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TJaguarF-Pace2.0t
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
6.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
6.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
36.4 s
36.8 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
240 hp
179 kW
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
250 hp
186 kW

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t has 10 hp more than Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T.

The biggest power difference is between Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
365 Nm
269 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
1,624 kg
3,580 lb
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
1,710 kg
3,770 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
221 km/h
137 mph
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T7.5 s
JaguarF-Pace2.0t6.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t and Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t and Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
706 km
439 mi
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
887 km
551 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
240 hp
179 kW
7.5 s
221 km/h
137 mph
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
250 hp
186 kW
6.8 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,595 mm
180.9 in
Height
1,735 mm
68.3 in
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,746 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,667 mm
65.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
7.5 s
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
6.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TJaguarF-Pace2.0t
Power
240 hp
179 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
6.8 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,624 kg
3,580 lb
1,710 kg
3,770 lb
Fuel consumption
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,595 mm
180.9 in
Height
1,735 mm
68.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,746 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,667 mm
65.6 in
Range score
706 km
439 mi
887 km
551 mi
CO2 score
197 g/km
163 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSubaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 TJaguar F-Pace 2.0t
Consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.88 LC100 km12.42 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.94 LC100 mi20.00 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,231 LC/year1,864 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T

  • Is 86 kg lighter
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 15 Nm more
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 181 km (113 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 145 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 34 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Subaru Forester IV Sport 2.0 T
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Sport 2.0 T
2.0
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsSubaruForester IV2.0
2.0t
2.0i
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0tvsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Sport 2.0 T
2.5 Turbo
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsSubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
2.0t
2.0 P250
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0tvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
Sport 2.0 T
2.5 XT
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsSubaruForester III2.5 XT
2.0t
2.0i
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0tvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Sport 2.0 T
2.5 i 16V Turbo
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsSubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo
2.0t
2.0 T5
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0tvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Sport 2.0 T
2.0d
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
2.0t
2.0
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0tvsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
Sport 2.0 T
2.0 BiTDI
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
2.0t
2.0 TFSI
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0tvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI
Subaru Forester IV · Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T vs Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t - car comparison - FastVsFaster