AUDI Q5 II (FY)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSIvsJaguar F-Pace 2.0t
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace
2.0t
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful252 hp188 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t109 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best estimated range972 km604 mi
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score58/100
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions163 g/km
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | JaguarF-Pace2.0t |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252hp188kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 1,710kg3,770lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | - |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.7s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 74.6s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.4s Calculated | 36.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 972km604mi Calculated | 887km551mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,663mm184in | 4,746mm187in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 2,070mm81in |
| Height | 1,659mm65in | 1,667mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,641mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,654mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 164g/km | 163g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | JaguarF-Pace2.0t |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.4 s | 36.8 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 100 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | 252 hp 188 kW |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 250 hp 186 kW |
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSI has 2 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSI: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | 6.3 s |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSI and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | 972 km 604 mi |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 887 km 551 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | 252 hp 188 kW | 6.3 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.8 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | JaguarF-Pace2.0t | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp 188 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 972 km 604 mi | 887 km 551 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 164 g/km | 163 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSI | Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 85 km (53 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
- Emits 1 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























