Car comparison

Subaru Forester IV · Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 TvsSubaru Forester III · Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Subaru Forester IV · Facelift 2016

Sport 2.0 T

240 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2016-2018
VS

Subaru Forester III · Facelift 2010

2.5 Turbo

230 hp2457 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2010-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T

  • Fastest top speed
    221 km/h
    137 mph
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.5 L/100 km
    27.7 mpg US
    33.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.2 L/100 km
    21.0 mpg US
    25.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    197 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    706 km
    439 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TSubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
Power
240hp179kW
230hp172kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,624kg3,580lb
1,545kg3,406lb
Gross weight
2,110kg4,652lb
-
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
79.3s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph
Calculated
74.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
7.1s
0-200 km/h
36.4s
Calculated
35.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
706km439mi
Calculated
571km355mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
2,457cc150cu in
Length
4,595mm181in
4,560mm180in
Width
1,795mm71in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,735mm68in
1,700mm67in
Wheelbase
2,640mm104in
2,615mm103in
Front track
1,545mm61in
1,530mm60in
Rear track
1,555mm61in
1,530mm60in
Ground clearance
220mm9in
225mm9in
Trunk volume
505L
450L
Max trunk volume
1,557L
1,660L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
60L
CO2 emissions
197g/km
248g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 TSubaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 TurboPowerTorque
  • Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T: Power / Torque
  • Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T5,600 rpm2,400-3,600 rpm5,850 rpm
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo5,200 rpm2,800 rpm5,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TSubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
7.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
36.4 s
35.1 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
240 hp
179 kW
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
230 hp
172 kW

Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T has 10 hp more than Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo and Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
1,624 kg
3,580 lb
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
1,545 kg
3,406 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
221 km/h
137 mph
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T7.5 s
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo7.1 s

Although Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T has more power, Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo and Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T and Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo: 2.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
706 km
439 mi
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
571 km
355 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
240 hp
179 kW
7.5 s
221 km/h
137 mph
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
230 hp
172 kW
7.1 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,595 mm
180.9 in
Height
1,735 mm
68.3 in
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,560 mm
179.5 in
Height
1,700 mm
66.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
7.5 s
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
7.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TSubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
Power
240 hp
179 kW
230 hp
172 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
7.1 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,624 kg
3,580 lb
1,545 kg
3,406 lb
Fuel consumption
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,595 mm
180.9 in
Height
1,735 mm
68.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,560 mm
179.5 in
Height
1,700 mm
66.9 in
Range score
706 km
439 mi
571 km
355 mi
CO2 score
197 g/km
248 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSubaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 TSubaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo
Consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.88 LC100 km18.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.94 LC100 mi29.57 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,231 LC/year2,756 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 134 km (84 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 55 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 51 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo

  • Is 79 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Subaru Forester IV Sport 2.0 T
Subaru Forester III 2.5 Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Sport 2.0 T
2.0
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsSubaruForester IV2.0
Sport 2.0 T
2.5 Turbo
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsSubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
2.5 Turbo
2.5 XT
VS
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 TurbovsSubaruForester III2.5 XT
2.5 Turbo
2.5 i 16V Turbo
VS
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 TurbovsSubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo
2.5 Turbo
GLK 350 CDI V6
VS
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 TurbovsMercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6
Sport 2.0 T
2.0d
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
2.5 Turbo
28i
VS
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 TurbovsBMWX1 (E84)28i
Sport 2.0 T
2.0 BiTDI
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
2.5 Turbo
2.0 TFSI
VS
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 TurbovsAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
Sport 2.0 T
2.0 D5
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
2.5 Turbo
3.5 V6
VS
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 TurbovsNissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
Sport 2.0 T
2.0
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
Subaru Forester IV · Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T vs Subaru Forester III · Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster