Car comparison

AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSIvsSubaru Forester III · Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q5 I (8R)

2.0 TFSI

211 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2011-2012
VS

Subaru Forester III · Facelift 2010

2.5 Turbo

230 hp2457 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2010-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    159 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,043 km
    648 mi
  • Largest trunk
    460 L
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    83/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSISubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
Power
211hp157kW
230hp172kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,910kg4,211lb
1,545kg3,406lb
Gross weight
2,490kg5,490lb
-
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
85.8s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
74.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
7.1s
0-200 km/h
35.0s
Calculated
35.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.7s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,043km648mi
Calculated
571km355mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
2,457cc150cu in
Length
4,629mm182in
4,560mm180in
Width
1,898mm75in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,653mm65in
1,700mm67in
Wheelbase
2,807mm111in
2,615mm103in
Front track
1,617mm64in
1,530mm60in
Rear track
1,613mm64in
1,530mm60in
Ground clearance-
225mm9in
Trunk volume
460L
450L
Max trunk volume
1,480L
1,660L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
72L
60L
CO2 emissions
159g/km
248g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSISubaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 TurboPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI4,300-6,000 rpm1,500-4,200 rpm6,250 rpm
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo5,200 rpm2,800 rpm5,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSISubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.7 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
7.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.0 s
35.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
211 hp
157 kW
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
230 hp
172 kW

Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo has 19 hp more than AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI and Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo: 19 hp (14 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
1,910 kg
4,211 lb
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
1,545 kg
3,406 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
225 km/h
140 mph
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI7.1 s
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo7.1 s

Although Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo has more power, AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI and Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo: 3.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
1,043 km
648 mi
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
571 km
355 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
211 hp
157 kW
7.1 s
225 km/h
140 mph
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
230 hp
172 kW
7.1 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,629 mm
182.2 in
Height
1,653 mm
65.1 in
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,560 mm
179.5 in
Height
1,700 mm
66.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.1 s
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
7.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSISubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
Power
211 hp
157 kW
230 hp
172 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
7.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,910 kg
4,211 lb
1,545 kg
3,406 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,629 mm
182.2 in
Height
1,653 mm
65.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,560 mm
179.5 in
Height
1,700 mm
66.9 in
Range score
1,043 km
648 mi
571 km
355 mi
CO2 score
159 g/km
248 g/km
Trunk score
460 L
16.2 cu ft
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSISubaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km18.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi29.57 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year2,756 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI

  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 472 km (293 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 10 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 89 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Subaru Forester III Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo

  • Has 19 hp more
  • Is 365 kg lighter
  • Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI
Subaru Forester III 2.5 Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI Hybrid
VS
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid
2.5 Turbo
2.0
VS
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 TurbovsSubaruForester IV2.0
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
2.5 Turbo
2.5 XT
VS
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 TurbovsSubaruForester III2.5 XT
2.0 TFSI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
2.5 Turbo
Sport 2.0 T
VS
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 TurbovsSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
2.5 Turbo
2.5 i 16V Turbo
VS
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 TurbovsSubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI
2.5 Turbo
GLK 350 CDI V6
VS
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 TurbovsMercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 CDI V6
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI
2.5 Turbo
28i
VS
SubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 TurbovsBMWX1 (E84)28i
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI vs Subaru Forester III · Facelift 2010 2.5 Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster