Car comparison

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0vsSubaru Forester IV · Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Macan I (95B)

2.0

252 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2016-2018
VS

Subaru Forester IV · Facelift 2016

Sport 2.0 T

240 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    229 km/h
    142 mph
  • Most powerful
    252 hp
    188 kW
  • Highest torque
    370 Nm
    273 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    172 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    878 km
    546 mi
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
Power
252hp188kW
240hp179kW
Torque
370Nm273lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,770kg3,902lb
1,624kg3,580lb
Gross weight
2,445kg5,390lb
2,110kg4,652lb
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
221 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
80.4s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
79.1s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
30.9s
Calculated
36.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton
Calculated
216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
878km546mi
Calculated
706km439mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,697mm185in
4,595mm181in
Width
1,923mm76in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,624mm64in
1,735mm68in
Wheelbase
2,807mm111in
2,640mm104in
Front track
1,655mm65in
1,545mm61in
Rear track
1,651mm65in
1,555mm61in
Ground clearance
185mm7in
220mm9in
Trunk volume
500L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,500L
1,557L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
65L
60L
CO2 emissions
172g/km
197g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 TPowerTorque
  • Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.05,000-6,800 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm7,050 rpm
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T5,600 rpm2,400-3,600 rpm5,850 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.9 s
36.4 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
221 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
252 hp
188 kW
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
240 hp
179 kW

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 has 12 hp more than Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T.

The biggest power difference is between Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T and Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: 12 hp (9 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
1,624 kg
3,580 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
229 km/h
142 mph
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
221 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.06.7 s
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T7.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 and Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 and Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T: 1.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
878 km
546 mi
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
706 km
439 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
252 hp
188 kW
6.7 s
229 km/h
142 mph
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
240 hp
179 kW
7.5 s
221 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
Power
252 hp
188 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,595 mm
180.9 in
Height
1,735 mm
68.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
Power
252 hp
188 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
6.7 s
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheMacan I (95B)2.0SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
Power
252 hp
188 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
7.5 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
221 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
1,624 kg
3,580 lb
Fuel consumption
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,595 mm
180.9 in
Height
1,735 mm
68.3 in
Range score
878 km
546 mi
706 km
439 mi
CO2 score
172 g/km
197 g/km
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Macan I (95B) 2.0Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T
Consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.95 LC100 km14.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.84 LC100 mi23.94 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,943 LC/year2,231 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0

  • Has 12 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 172 km (107 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 25 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T

  • Is 146 kg lighter
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 5 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
Subaru Forester IV Sport 2.0 T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
Sport 2.0 T
2.0
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsSubaruForester IV2.0
2.0
2.0
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20212.0
Sport 2.0 T
2.5 Turbo
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsSubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
2.0
3.0 diesel V6
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6
Sport 2.0 T
2.5 XT
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsSubaruForester III2.5 XT
2.0
2.0 TFSI
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI
Sport 2.0 T
2.5 i 16V Turbo
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsSubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo
2.0
2.0 BiTDI
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Sport 2.0 T
2.0d
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
2.0
2.0 T5
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
2.0
30d
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsBMWX6 (F16)30d
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 vs Subaru Forester IV · Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T - car comparison - FastVsFaster