AUDI Q5 II (FY)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSIvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful252 hp188 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,720 kg3,792 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t109 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions164 g/km
- Best estimated range972 km604 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252hp188kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 1,852kg4,083lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | 2,370kg5,225lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.7s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 74.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.4s Calculated | 34.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 972km604mi Calculated | 811km504mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,663mm184in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,659mm65in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 164g/km | 171g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.4 s | 34.7 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 100 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | 252 hp 188 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW |
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSI has 2 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSI: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 1,852 kg 4,083 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | 6.3 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | 972 km 604 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 811 km 504 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | 252 hp 188 kW | 6.3 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp 188 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | 1,852 kg 4,083 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 972 km 604 mi | 811 km 504 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 164 g/km | 171 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSI | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 132 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 161 km (100 mi) more estimated range
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
- Emits 7 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























