Car comparison

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar E-Pace

2.0 P250

250 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2020
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T5

250 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250

  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Highest torque
    365 Nm
    269 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,832 kg
    4,039 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    136 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.5 L/100 km
    24.8 mpg US
    29.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    890 km
    553 mi
  • Largest trunk
    1,234 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    171 g/km
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250hp186kW
250hp186kW
Torque
365Nm269lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,832kg4,039lb
1,852kg4,083lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
2,370kg5,225lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
85.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
74.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.0s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
32.2s
Calculated
34.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
890km553mi
Calculated
811km504mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,984mm78in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,649mm65in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,635mm64in
1,668mm66in
Rear track
1,634mm64in
1,673mm66in
Ground clearance
204mm8in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
1,234L
505L
Max trunk volume
2,577L
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
69L
60L
CO2 emissions
174g/km
171g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5PowerTorque
  • Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P2505,500 rpm1,200-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.0 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.2 s
34.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
152 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
250 hp
186 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
1,832 kg
4,039 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
1,852 kg
4,083 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
230 km/h
143 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P2507.0 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T56.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
890 km
553 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
811 km
504 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
250 hp
186 kW
7.0 s
230 km/h
143 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
6.9 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.0 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.0 s
6.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,832 kg
4,039 lb
1,852 kg
4,083 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
890 km
553 mi
811 km
504 mi
CO2 score
174 g/km
171 g/km
Trunk score
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km12.95 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi20.84 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year1,943 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250

  • Has 15 Nm more
  • Is 20 kg lighter
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 79 km (49 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 729 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Emits 3 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 P250
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
2.0 P250
25t
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsJaguarF-Pace25t
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
2.0 P250
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 T5
2.0
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
2.0 P250
2.0 T5
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
2.0 T5
2.0 BiTDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
2.0 P250
2.0
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
2.0 T5
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI
2.0 T5
Sport 2.0 T
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
2.0 T5
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsFordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster