Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII
Car comparison
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0vsHyundai Centennial 4.5 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHyundai Centennial
4.5 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Lightest1,445 kg3,186 lb
- Best power-to-weight183 hp/t137 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption15.4 L/100 km15.3 mpg US18.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score78/100
Hyundai Centennial 4.5 V8
- Most powerful270 hp201 kW
- Highest torque381 Nm281 lb-ft
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | HyundaiCentennial4.5 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 270hp201kW |
| Torque | 355Nm262lb-ft | 381Nm281lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,445kg3,186lb | 1,990kg4,387lb |
| Gross weight | 1,885kg4,156lb | - |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 54.9s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 87.0s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.0s Calculated | 29.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 183hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 246Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 505km314mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 4,498cc274cu in |
| Length | 4,490mm177in | 5,065mm199in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,465mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,625mm103in | 2,830mm111in |
| Front track | 1,515mm60in | 1,615mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,515mm60in | 1,615mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 430L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 258g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: Power / Torque
- Hyundai Centennial 4.5 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| HyundaiCentennial4.5 V8 | 5,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | HyundaiCentennial4.5 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.0 s | 29.9 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 265 hp 198 kW |
| HyundaiCentennial4.5 V8 | 270 hp 201 kW |
Hyundai Centennial 4.5 V8 has 5 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and Hyundai Centennial 4.5 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 355 Nm 262 lb-ft |
| HyundaiCentennial4.5 V8 | 381 Nm 281 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb |
| HyundaiCentennial4.5 V8 | 1,990 kg 4,387 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| HyundaiCentennial4.5 V8 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 6.1 s |
| HyundaiCentennial4.5 V8 | 8.5 s |
Although Hyundai Centennial 4.5 V8 has more power, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and Hyundai Centennial 4.5 V8: 2.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| HyundaiCentennial4.5 V8 | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.1 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| HyundaiCentennial4.5 V8 | 270 hp 201 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HyundaiCentennial4.5 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | HyundaiCentennial4.5 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 270 hp 201 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 355 Nm 262 lb-ft | 381 Nm 281 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb | 1,990 kg 4,387 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 505 km 314 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 258 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
- Is 545 kg lighter
- Is 2.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 48 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
Hyundai Centennial 4.5 V8
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 26 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























