Mazda CX-60
Car comparison
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv GvsHongqi HS5 · Facelift 2023 2.0T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHongqi HS5 · Facelift 2023
2.0T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed219 km/h136 mph
- Most powerful284 hp212 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score87/100
Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T
- Lightest1,755 kg3,869 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.3 L/100 km32.0 mpg US38.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range872 km542 mi
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 284hp212kW | 252hp188kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,949kg4,297lb | 1,755kg3,869lb |
| Gross weight | 2,500kg5,512lb | 2,205kg4,861lb |
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.6s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 77.4s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.7s Calculated | 41.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32mpg US38.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 231Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 784km487mi Calculated | 872km542mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,283cc200cu in | 1,989cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,745mm187in | 4,785mm188in |
| Width | 1,890mm74in | 1,905mm75in |
| Height | 1,688mm66in | 1,700mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,870mm113in | 2,870mm113in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | 1,623mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,645mm65in | 1,600mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 179mm7in | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 477L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,726L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 171g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G: Power / Torque
- Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 2,000-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.7 s | 41.0 s |
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 147 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 284 hp 212 kW |
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T | 252 hp 188 kW |
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G has 32 hp more than Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T.
The biggest power difference is between Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G: 32 hp (24 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 1,949 kg 4,297 lb |
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 6.9 s |
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G and Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T | 7.3 L/100 km 32.0 mpg US 38.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 784 km 487 mi |
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T | 872 km 542 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 284 hp 212 kW | 6.9 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T | 252 hp 188 kW | 7.6 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.0 mpg US 38.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T | 7.3 L/100 km 32.0 mpg US 38.5 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.0 mpg US 38.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 284 hp 212 kW | 252 hp 188 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,949 kg 4,297 lb | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.0 mpg US 38.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 784 km 487 mi | 872 km 542 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 171 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 477 L 16.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G | Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32 mpg US38.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 12.84 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 20.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 1,101 L291 US gal242 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 1,927 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G
- Has 32 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T
- Is 194 kg lighter
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 88 km (55 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























