Car comparison

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv GvsHongqi HS5 · Facelift 2023 2.0T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-60

3.3 e-Skyactiv G

284 hp3283 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-present
VS

Hongqi HS5 · Facelift 2023

2.0T

252 hp1989 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    219 km/h
    136 mph
  • Most powerful
    284 hp
    212 kW
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    146 hp/t
    109 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    57/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T

  • Lightest
    1,755 kg
    3,869 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.0 mpg US
    38.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    872 km
    542 mi
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv GHongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
Power
284hp212kW
252hp188kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
380Nm280lb-ft
Curb weight
1,949kg4,297lb
1,755kg3,869lb
Gross weight
2,500kg5,512lb
2,205kg4,861lb
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
72.6s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
77.4s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.9s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
34.7s
Calculated
41.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32mpg US38.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
231Nm/t154lb-ft/ton
Calculated
217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
784km487mi
Calculated
872km542mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,283cc200cu in
1,989cc121cu in
Length
4,745mm187in
4,785mm188in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,905mm75in
Height
1,688mm66in
1,700mm67in
Wheelbase
2,870mm113in
2,870mm113in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,623mm64in
Rear track
1,645mm65in
1,600mm63in
Ground clearance
179mm7in
200mm8in
Trunk volume
477L
-
Max trunk volume
1,726L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
64L
CO2 emissions
171g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv GHongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0TPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G: Power / Torque
  • Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G5,000-6,000 rpm2,000-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T5,500 rpm1,800-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv GHongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.9 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.7 s
41.0 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
95 mph
147 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
284 hp
212 kW
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
252 hp
188 kW

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G has 32 hp more than Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T.

The biggest power difference is between Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G: 32 hp (24 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
380 Nm
280 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
1,949 kg
4,297 lb
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
1,755 kg
3,869 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
219 km/h
136 mph
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G6.9 s
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T7.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G and Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
7.3 L/100 km
32.0 mpg US
38.5 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
784 km
487 mi
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
872 km
542 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
284 hp
212 kW
6.9 s
219 km/h
136 mph
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
252 hp
188 kW
7.6 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
Power
284 hp
212 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,688 mm
66.5 in
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
Power
252 hp
188 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,785 mm
188.4 in
Height
1,700 mm
66.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
Power
284 hp
212 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
Power
252 hp
188 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.0 mpg US
38.5 mpg UK

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
6.9 s
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
7.3 L/100 km
32.0 mpg US
38.5 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.0 mpg US
38.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv GHongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
Power
284 hp
212 kW
252 hp
188 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.9 s
7.6 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,949 kg
4,297 lb
1,755 kg
3,869 lb
Fuel consumption
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
7.3 L/100 km
32.0 mpg US
38.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,688 mm
66.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,785 mm
188.4 in
Height
1,700 mm
66.9 in
Range score
784 km
487 mi
872 km
542 mi
CO2 score
171 g/km
-
Trunk score
477 L
16.8 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv GHongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T
Consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK7.3 L/100 km32 mpg US38.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.95 LC100 km12.84 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.84 LC100 mi20.67 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal1,101 L291 US gal242 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,943 LC/year1,927 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G

  • Has 32 hp more
  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T

  • Is 194 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 88 km (55 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G
Hongqi HS5 2.0T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G vs Hongqi HS5 · Facelift 2023 2.0T - car comparison - FastVsFaster