Honda S2000 (AP1) · Facelift 2004
Car comparison
Honda S2000 (AP1) · Facelift 2004 2.0vsVolvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo C70 Convertible
2.0 20V Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Lightest1,270 kg2,800 lb
- Best power-to-weight189 hp/t141 kW/t5.3 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score80/100
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo
- Highest torque310 Nm229 lb-ft
- Largest trunk260 L
- Best overall score49/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 | VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 208Nm153lb-ft | 310Nm229lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,270kg2,800lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 1,535kg3,384lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.8s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 101.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.5s Calculated | 35.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 189hp/t141kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 505km314mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,135mm163in | 4,720mm186in |
| Width | 1,750mm69in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,285mm51in | 1,410mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,400mm94in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,470mm58in | 1,520mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,510mm59in | 1,520mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 108mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 143L | 260L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 235g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0: Power / Torque
- Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 | 8,300 rpm | 7,500 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 5,700 rpm | 2,700 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 | VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.5 s | 35.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 225 hp 168 kW |
Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0 has 15 hp more than Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo and Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 | 208 Nm 153 lb-ft |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 | 6.2 s |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0 and Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo: 1.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | 225 hp 168 kW | 7.9 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 | VolvoC70 Convertible2.0 20V Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 208 Nm 153 lb-ft | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 505 km 314 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 235 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 143 L 5.1 cu ft | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,599 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0
- Has 15 hp more
- Is 300 kg lighter
- Is 1.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 46 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.0 20V Turbo
- Has 102 Nm more
- Has 117 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























