Honda S2000 (AP1) · Facelift 2004
Car comparison
Honda S2000 (AP1) · Facelift 2004 2.0vsAlfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Spider (939)
3.2 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,270 kg2,800 lb
- Best power-to-weight189 hp/t141 kW/t5.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score80/100
Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Highest torque322 Nm237 lb-ft
- Best estimated range574 km357 mi
- Largest trunk253 L
- Best overall score50/100
- Best practicality score42/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 | Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 208Nm153lb-ft | 322Nm237lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,270kg2,800lb | 1,765kg3,891lb |
| Gross weight | 1,535kg3,384lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.8s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 99.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.5s Calculated | 31.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 189hp/t141kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 505km314mi Calculated | 574km357mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 3,195cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,135mm163in | 4,393mm173in |
| Width | 1,750mm69in | 1,830mm72in |
| Height | 1,285mm51in | 1,318mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,400mm94in | 2,528mm100in |
| Front track | 1,470mm58in | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,510mm59in | 1,559mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 108mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 143L | 253L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 235g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 | 8,300 rpm | 7,500 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 6,200 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 | Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.5 s | 31.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6 has 20 hp more than Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0 and Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 | 208 Nm 153 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 | 6.2 s |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 7.0 s |
Although Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6 has more power, Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0 and Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0 and Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 | 505 km 314 mi |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 574 km 357 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.0 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 |
| 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.0 | Alfa RomeoSpider (939)3.2 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 208 Nm 153 lb-ft | 322 Nm 237 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 505 km 314 mi | 574 km 357 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 235 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 143 L 5.1 cu ft | 253 L 8.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0 | Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK | 12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.33 LC100 km | 21.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi | 34.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal | 1,830 L483 US gal403 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,599 LC/year | 3,203 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.0
- Is 495 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 42 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Alfa Romeo Spider (939) 3.2 V6
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 114 Nm more
- Has 69 km (43 mi) more estimated range
- Has 110 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























