Car comparison

Ford S-MAX II · Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFord S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford S-MAX II · Facelift 2019

2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

240 hpDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboMinivan / MPV2019-2023
VS

Ford S-MAX II

2.0 EcoBoost

240 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph Unrestricted
    220 km/h
    137 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.2 L/100 km
    32.7 mpg US
    39.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,050 km
    652 mi
  • Largest trunk
    965 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    95/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueFordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240hp179kW
240hp179kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
345Nm254lb-ft
Curb weight
1,876kg4,136lb
1,704kg3,757lb
Gross weight
2,600kg5,732lb
2,510kg5,534lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
226 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
106.9s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
97.7s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.6s
8.4s
0-200 km/h
40.0s
Calculated
39.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.1s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
267Nm/t178lb-ft/ton
Calculated
202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,050km652mi
Calculated
787km489mi
Calculated
Displacement-
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,796mm189in
4,796mm189in
Width
1,916mm75in
1,916mm75in
Height
1,655mm65in
1,655mm65in
Wheelbase
2,850mm112in
2,849mm112in
Front track-
1,606mm63in
Rear track-
1,606mm63in
Ground clearance-
150mm6in
Trunk volume
965L
285L
Max trunk volume
2,020L
2,020L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
63L
70L
CO2 emissions-
204g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueFord S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue: Power / Torque
  • Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue4,000 rpm2,000 rpm4,250 rpm
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost5,400 rpm2,300-4,900 rpm5,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueFordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.1 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.6 s
8.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.0 s
39.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
226 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
144 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
240 hp
179 kW
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
345 Nm
254 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
1,876 kg
4,136 lb
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
1,704 kg
3,757 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
226 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue8.6 s
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost8.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost and Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost: 2.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
1,050 km
652 mi
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
787 km
489 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
240 hp
179 kW
8.6 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
8.4 s
226 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
965 L
34.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
8.6 s
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
8.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueFordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
345 Nm
254 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.6 s
8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
226 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,876 kg
4,136 lb
1,704 kg
3,757 lb
Fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
965 L
34.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
Range score
1,050 km
652 mi
787 km
489 mi
CO2 score
-
204 g/km
Trunk score
965 L
34.1 cu ft
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueFord S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km15.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi25.07 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year2,336 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

  • Has 155 Nm more
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 263 km (164 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 680 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 172 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
2.0 EcoBoost
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
223i
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
225i
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 TDI SCR
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsVolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI SCR
2.0 EcoBoost
220i
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
3.5 V6
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Ford S-MAX II · Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue vs Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster