Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoostvsFord S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord S-MAX II
2.0 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Lightest1,661 kg3,662 lb
- Best power-to-weight144 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range843 km524 mi
- Largest trunk285 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | - | 345Nm254lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,661kg3,662lb | 1,704kg3,757lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | 2,510kg5,534lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 105.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 97.7s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.8s Calculated | 39.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 144hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | - | 202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 843km524mi Calculated | 787km489mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,903mm193in | 4,796mm189in |
| Width | 2,154mm85in | 1,916mm75in |
| Height | 1,660mm65in | 1,655mm65in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,849mm112in |
| Front track | - | 1,606mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 150mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 285L | 285L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,000L | 2,020L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 204g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.8 s | 39.8 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 240 hp 179 kW |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost | 240 hp 179 kW |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 1,661 kg 3,662 lb |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost | 1,704 kg 3,757 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost | 226 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 7.9 s |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 843 km 524 mi |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost | 787 km 489 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.9 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost | 240 hp 179 kW | 8.4 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | - | 345 Nm 254 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,661 kg 3,662 lb | 1,704 kg 3,757 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 843 km 524 mi | 787 km 489 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 204 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost | Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost
- Is 43 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 57 km (35 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























