Car comparison

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoostvsFord S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010

2.0 EcoBoost

240 hpGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2014
VS

Ford S-MAX II

2.0 EcoBoost

240 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Lightest
    1,661 kg
    3,662 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    144 hp/t
    108 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.3 L/100 km
    28.3 mpg US
    34.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.5 L/100 km
    20.5 mpg US
    24.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    843 km
    524 mi
  • Largest trunk
    285 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    80/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostFordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240hp179kW
240hp179kW
Torque-
345Nm254lb-ft
Curb weight
1,661kg3,662lb
1,704kg3,757lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
2,510kg5,534lb
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
226 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
105.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
97.7s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
8.4s
0-200 km/h
35.8s
Calculated
39.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
144hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight-
202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
843km524mi
Calculated
787km489mi
Calculated
Displacement-
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,903mm193in
4,796mm189in
Width
2,154mm85in
1,916mm75in
Height
1,660mm65in
1,655mm65in
Wheelbase-
2,849mm112in
Front track-
1,606mm63in
Rear track-
1,606mm63in
Ground clearance-
150mm6in
Trunk volume
285L
285L
Max trunk volume
2,000L
2,020L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
7
Fuel tank
70L
70L
CO2 emissions-
204g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostFordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
8.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.8 s
39.8 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
226 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
146 km/h
91 mph
144 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
1,661 kg
3,662 lb
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
1,704 kg
3,757 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
235 km/h
146 mph
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
226 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
843 km
524 mi
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
787 km
489 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
7.9 s
235 km/h
146 mph
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
8.4 s
226 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
7.9 s
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
8.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostFordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
-
345 Nm
254 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
8.4 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
226 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,661 kg
3,662 lb
1,704 kg
3,757 lb
Fuel consumption
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
Range score
843 km
524 mi
787 km
489 mi
CO2 score
-
204 g/km
Trunk score
285 L
10.1 cu ft
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoostFord S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost
Consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.53 LC100 km15.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.38 LC100 mi25.07 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,179 LC/year2,336 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 43 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 57 km (35 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford S-MAX 2.0 EcoBoost
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost vs Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster