Car comparison

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoostvsFord Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford S-MAX II

2.0 EcoBoost

240 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2018
VS

Ford Galaxy III

2.0 EcoBoost

240 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Lightest
    1,658 kg
    3,655 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    145 hp/t
    108 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.9 L/100 km
    29.8 mpg US
    35.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.3 L/100 km
    22.8 mpg US
    27.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    180 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    886 km
    551 mi
  • Largest trunk
    300 L
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    226 km/h
    140 mph
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    345 Nm
    254 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240hp179kW
240hp179kW
Torque
345Nm254lb-ft
345Nm254lb-ft
Curb weight
1,704kg3,757lb
1,658kg3,655lb
Gross weight
2,510kg5,534lb
2,585kg5,699lb
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
To 99% top speed
97.7s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph
Calculated
98.7s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
39.8s
Calculated
43.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton
Calculated
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
787km489mi
Calculated
886km551mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,796mm189in
4,848mm191in
Width
1,916mm75in
1,916mm75in
Height
1,655mm65in
1,747mm69in
Wheelbase
2,849mm112in
2,849mm112in
Front track
1,606mm63in
1,606mm63in
Rear track
1,606mm63in
1,606mm63in
Ground clearance
150mm6in
124mm5in
Trunk volume
285L
300L
Max trunk volume
2,020L
2,339L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
70L
70L
CO2 emissions
204g/km
180g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoostFord Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost5,400 rpm2,300-4,900 rpm5,650 rpm
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost5,400 rpm2,300-4,900 rpm5,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
39.8 s
43.3 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
144 km/h
89 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
345 Nm
254 lb-ft
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
345 Nm
254 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
1,704 kg
3,757 lb
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
1,658 kg
3,655 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
226 km/h
140 mph
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
222 km/h
138 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost8.4 s
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost8.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
787 km
489 mi
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
886 km
551 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
8.4 s
226 km/h
140 mph
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
8.6 s
222 km/h
138 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
8.4 s
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
345 Nm
254 lb-ft
345 Nm
254 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
8.6 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Lightness
1,704 kg
3,757 lb
1,658 kg
3,655 lb
Fuel consumption
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
Range score
787 km
489 mi
886 km
551 mi
CO2 score
204 g/km
180 g/km
Trunk score
285 L
10.1 cu ft
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoostFord Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost
Consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.58 LC100 km13.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.07 LC100 mi22.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,336 LC/year2,074 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 46 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 100 km (62 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 15 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 24 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
2.0 EcoBoost
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
225i
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i
2.0 EcoBoost
220i
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TDI
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost vs Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster