Car comparison

Kia XCeed · Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDIvsFord Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Kia XCeed · Facelift 2022

1.6 T-GDI

204 hp1591 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2022-2024
VS

Ford Puma

ST 1.5 EcoBoost

200 hp1496 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2020-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,358 kg
    2,994 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    147 hp/t
    110 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.0 L/100 km
    47.0 mpg US
    56.5 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    456 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelKiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
204hp152kW
200hp149kW
Torque
265Nm195lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,456kg3,210lb
1,358kg2,994lb
Gross weight
1,880kg4,145lb
1,815kg4,001lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
77.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
69.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
6.7s
0-200 km/h
31.2s
Calculated
32.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
6.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
140hp/t104kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
769km478mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,591cc97cu in
1,496cc91cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,226mm166in
Width
1,826mm72in
-
Height
1,495mm59in
1,520mm60in
Wheelbase
2,650mm104in
2,588mm102in
Front track
1,575mm62in
-
Rear track
1,573mm62in
-
Ground clearance-
152mm6in
Trunk volume
426L
456L
Max trunk volume
1,378L
1,216L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDIFord Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI: Power / Torque
  • Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI5,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost6,000 rpm2,500-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricKiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
6.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
6.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.2 s
32.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
95 mph
154 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
204 hp
152 kW
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
200 hp
149 kW

Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI has 4 hp more than Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost and Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
1,456 kg
3,210 lb
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
1,358 kg
2,994 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI7.5 s
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost6.7 s

Although Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI has more power, Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost and Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost and Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
204 hp
152 kW
7.5 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
200 hp
149 kW
6.7 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
426 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,495 mm
58.9 in
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
7.5 s
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
6.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleKiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
204 hp
152 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,456 kg
3,210 lb
1,358 kg
2,994 lb
Fuel consumption
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
426 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,495 mm
58.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
Range score
769 km
478 mi
-
Trunk score
426 L
15.0 cu ft
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleKia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDIFord Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost
Consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.38 LC100 km10.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.31 LC100 mi16.90 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used975 L258 US gal214 UK gal900 L238 US gal198 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,706 LC/year1,575 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

  • Has 55 Nm more
  • Is 98 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 30 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Kia XCeed 1.6 T-GDI
Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.6 T-GDI
40 TFSI
VS
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.6 T-GDI
Standard Range 50 kWh
VS
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIvsTeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
1.6 T-GDI
2.0 TSI
VS
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIvsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
40 TDI
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
1.6 T-GDI
1.6T
VS
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIvsHyundaiKona II1.6T
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
1.6 T-GDI
GLA 220d
VS
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
1.6 T-GDI
2.0 TSI
VS
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIvsCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.0 TDI
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Kia XCeed · Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI vs Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster