Kia XCeed · Facelift 2022
Car comparison
Kia XCeed · Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDIvsCupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Terramar
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Lightest1,456 kg3,210 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range769 km478 mi
- Best economy score89/100
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 265Nm195lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,456kg3,210lb | 1,665kg3,671lb |
| Gross weight | 1,880kg4,145lb | 2,280kg5,027lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 77.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.2s Calculated | 32.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t104kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 769km478mi Calculated | 750km466mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,591cc97cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,395mm173in | 4,519mm178in |
| Width | 1,826mm72in | 1,869mm74in |
| Height | 1,495mm59in | 1,586mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,681mm106in |
| Front track | 1,575mm62in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,573mm62in | 1,580mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 426L | 540L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,378L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI: Power / Torque
- Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 4,500-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.2 s | 32.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI | 1,456 kg 3,210 lb |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI | 7.5 s |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI | 769 km 478 mi |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 750 km 466 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.1 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,456 kg 3,210 lb | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 769 km 478 mi | 750 km 466 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 426 L 15.0 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI | Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI
- Is 209 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 19 km (12 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
- Has 55 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 114 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























